FHCCX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FHCCX (Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FHCCX is a Health & Biotech Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FHCCX returned 5.39%/yr vs 21.88%/yr for FBGRX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FHCCX charges 1.72%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

FHCCX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHCCX achieves a -5.48% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 18.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FHCCX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 5.39%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.88% annualized return.

FHCCX

• 1D: -1.83%
• 1M: -1.14%
• YTD: -5.48%
• 6M: -22.16%
• 1Y: -5.48%
• 3Y*: -2.55%
• 5Y*: -2.61%
• 10Y*: 5.39%

FBGRX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 9.10%
• YTD: 18.56%
• 6M: 19.76%
• 1Y: 44.98%
• 3Y*: 32.54%
• 5Y*: 17.08%
• 10Y*: 21.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHCCX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FHCCX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C	-5.48%	-5.49%	3.20%	3.02%	-13.72%	10.43%	20.15%	26.96%	6.37%	23.12%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	18.56%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	33.43%	1.02%	36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FHCCX and FBGRX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 1996	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between FHCCX and FBGRX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FHCCX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHCCX

FHCCX Risk / Return Rank: 2
FHCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FHCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FHCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FHCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FHCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHCCX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHCCX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	2.67	-2.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.12	3.41	-3.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.45	-0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	3.67	-3.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.36	15.56	-15.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHCCX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHCCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHCCX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHCCX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22	2.67	-2.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13	0.69	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	0.93	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.68	-0.22

Drawdowns

FHCCX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHCCX drawdown since its inception was -45.28%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHCCX and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHCCX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.28%	-58.64%	+13.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.25%	-12.65%	-14.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.25%	-27.07%	-0.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.67%	-43.08%	+13.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.67%	-43.08%	+13.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.77%	0.00%	-23.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.19%	-12.53%	+2.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.26%	2.98%	+11.28%

Volatility

FHCCX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) at 4.14%. This indicates that FHCCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHCCX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.07%	4.14%	+0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.60%	13.00%	+9.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.64%	17.44%	+6.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.54%	24.88%	-5.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.57%	23.69%	-4.12%

FHCCX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHCCX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHCCX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FHCCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.60%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%
FHCCX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C	0.00%	0.00%	17.59%	0.00%	0.00%	8.32%	6.85%	0.41%	6.43%	0.00%	0.00%	7.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHCCX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

FHCCX and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FHCCX or FBGRX?

FHCCX has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to FBGRX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHCCX dropped -45.28% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.