FHAMX vs. LTSTX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FHAMX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend Income Fund Class A) and LTSTX (Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FHAMX returned 2.73%/yr vs 5.57%/yr for LTSTX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FHAMX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for LTSTX.

Performance

FHAMX vs. LTSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend Income Fund Class A (FHAMX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHAMX achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly lower than LTSTX's 5.01% return.

FHAMX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 4.60%
• 6M: 5.15%
• 1Y: 11.09%
• 3Y*: 7.53%
• 5Y*: 2.73%
• 10Y*: —

LTSTX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 2.04%
• YTD: 5.01%
• 6M: 5.40%
• 1Y: 13.75%
• 3Y*: 12.27%
• 5Y*: 5.57%
• 10Y*: 8.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHAMX vs. LTSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FHAMX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend Income Fund Class A	4.60%	9.85%	3.83%	7.83%	-11.91%	2.52%	8.33%	10.27%	-2.26%
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund	5.01%	12.16%	11.91%	13.30%	-15.23%	10.91%	13.70%	20.50%	-9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FHAMX and LTSTX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018	0.79

The correlation between FHAMX and LTSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHAMX vs. LTSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHAMX

FHAMX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FHAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FHAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
FHAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FHAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FHAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

LTSTX

LTSTX Risk / Return Rank: 54
LTSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
LTSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
LTSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
LTSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
LTSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHAMX vs. LTSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend Income Fund Class A (FHAMX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHAMX	LTSTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	2.11	+0.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.57	3.05	+0.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.41	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.96	2.68	+0.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.07	12.12	+0.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHAMX vs. LTSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHAMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the LTSTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHAMX and LTSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHAMX	LTSTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43	2.11	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.61	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	0.48	+0.32

Drawdowns

FHAMX vs. LTSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHAMX drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, smaller than the maximum LTSTX drawdown of -48.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHAMX and LTSTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHAMX	LTSTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.37%	-48.17%	+31.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.74%	-5.24%	+1.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.00%	-8.12%	+3.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.37%	-21.01%	+4.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.44%	-6.16%	+2.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.85%	1.16%	-0.31%

Volatility

FHAMX vs. LTSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend Income Fund Class A (FHAMX) is 1.85%, while Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX) has a volatility of 2.03%. This indicates that FHAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHAMX	LTSTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.85%	2.03%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.84%	5.39%	-1.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.54%	6.65%	-2.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.40%	9.18%	-3.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.00%	9.83%	-4.83%

FHAMX vs. LTSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHAMX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than LTSTX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHAMX vs. LTSTX - Dividend Comparison

FHAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, less than LTSTX's 11.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHAMX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend Income Fund Class A	2.73%	2.92%	2.75%	2.62%	4.35%	3.72%	2.35%	2.17%	1.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund	11.61%	12.19%	9.74%	4.26%	8.00%	7.66%	5.25%	6.91%	6.39%	4.75%	3.65%	8.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHAMX and LTSTX in my portfolio?

FHAMX and LTSTX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FHAMX or LTSTX?

LTSTX has higher volatility (2.03%) compared to FHAMX (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHAMX dropped -16.37% vs LTSTX's -48.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.