FGTMX vs. RSIIX
FGTMX (Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I) and RSIIX (RiverPark Strategic Income Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, FGTMX returned 3.73%/yr vs 5.27%/yr for RSIIX. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FGTMX charges 0.72%/yr vs 1.18%/yr for RSIIX.
Performance
FGTMX vs. RSIIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FGTMX having a 2.41% return and RSIIX slightly lower at 2.32%.
FGTMX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 2.41%
- 1Y
- 7.02%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 3.73%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.44%
RSIIX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 5.02%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FGTMX vs. RSIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGTMX Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I | 2.41% | 9.80% | 9.38% | 11.04% | -13.18% | 3.85% | 2.31% | 14.20% | -3.08% |
RSIIX RiverPark Strategic Income Fund | 2.32% | 6.04% | 8.44% | 9.59% | -3.31% | 11.60% | 3.42% | 3.50% | -0.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGTMX and RSIIX is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2018 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGTMX vs. RSIIX — Risk / Return Rank
FGTMX
RSIIX
FGTMX vs. RSIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I (FGTMX) and RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGTMX | RSIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.39 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 2.35 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.64 | 15.46 | -1.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGTMX vs. RSIIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGTMX drawdown since its inception was -22.37%, which is greater than RSIIX's maximum drawdown of -15.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGTMX and RSIIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGTMX | RSIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.37% | -15.55% | -6.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.33% | -1.79% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.15% | -1.79% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.56% | -5.61% | -10.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -0.21% | -1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.49% | -1.15% | -2.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 0.27% | +0.26% |
Volatility
FGTMX vs. RSIIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I (FGTMX) and RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) have volatilities of 0.55% and 0.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGTMX | RSIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.55% | 0.56% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.63% | 2.89% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35% | 3.12% | +0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.38% | 2.51% | +2.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.35% | 2.88% | +3.47% |
FGTMX vs. RSIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGTMX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than RSIIX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGTMX vs. RSIIX - Dividend Comparison
FGTMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.94%, less than RSIIX's 6.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGTMX Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I | 5.94% | 6.38% | 6.06% | 5.32% | 3.91% | 4.13% | 4.68% | 5.05% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSIIX RiverPark Strategic Income Fund | 6.63% | 7.75% | 7.67% | 7.61% | 6.58% | 5.12% | 5.77% | 4.84% | 4.59% | 4.98% | 5.10% | 6.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGTMX and RSIIX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSIIX has higher volatility (0.56%) compared to FGTMX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGTMX dropped -22.37% vs RSIIX's -15.55%.
FGTMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGTMX and RSIIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer