PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGTMX vs. THHYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGTMX vs. THHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I (FGTMX) and Toews Tactical Income Fund (THHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGTMX achieves a 3.56% return, which is significantly higher than THHYX's 0.17% return.


FGTMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.99%
YTD
3.56%
6M
4.40%
1Y
10.26%
3Y*
10.15%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*

THHYX

1D
-0.31%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
0.17%
6M
0.50%
1Y
3.56%
3Y*
4.73%
5Y*
1.51%
10Y*
2.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGTMX vs. THHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FGTMX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I
3.56%9.80%9.38%11.04%-13.18%3.85%2.31%14.20%-3.08%
THHYX
Toews Tactical Income Fund
0.17%3.44%5.48%4.51%-5.33%0.28%5.21%7.37%0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FGTMX and THHYX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2018

0.54

The correlation between FGTMX and THHYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGTMX vs. THHYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGTMX
FGTMX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FGTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FGTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

THHYX
THHYX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
THHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
THHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
THHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
THHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGTMX vs. THHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I (FGTMX) and Toews Tactical Income Fund (THHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGTMXTHHYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.82

1.30

+0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.84

3.47

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.08

7.80

+16.28

FGTMX vs. THHYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGTMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.28, which is higher than the THHYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGTMX and THHYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGTMXTHHYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.28

1.53

+1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.39

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.13

-0.39

Drawdowns

FGTMX vs. THHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGTMX drawdown since its inception was -22.37%, which is greater than THHYX's maximum drawdown of -8.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGTMX and THHYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGTMXTHHYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.37%

-8.83%

-13.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.33%

-1.12%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.15%

-3.35%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.56%

-8.83%

-7.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.81%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.56%

-1.62%

-1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

0.50%

-0.03%

Volatility

FGTMX vs. THHYX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I (FGTMX) has a higher volatility of 0.95% compared to Toews Tactical Income Fund (THHYX) at 0.77%. This indicates that FGTMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGTMXTHHYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

0.77%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.54%

1.65%

+0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.44%

2.54%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.39%

3.92%

+1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.40%

3.67%

+2.73%

FGTMX vs. THHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGTMX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than THHYX's 1.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGTMX vs. THHYX - Dividend Comparison

FGTMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, more than THHYX's 5.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGTMX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I
6.33%6.38%6.06%5.32%3.91%4.13%4.68%5.05%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%
THHYX
Toews Tactical Income Fund
5.45%4.91%5.44%4.33%1.61%2.79%2.21%3.84%2.43%6.56%3.30%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGTMX and THHYX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGTMX has higher volatility (0.95%) compared to THHYX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGTMX dropped -22.37% vs THHYX's -8.83%.

FGTMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGTMX and THHYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer