PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGTMX vs. FZROX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGTMX vs. FZROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I (FGTMX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGTMX achieves a 3.42% return, which is significantly lower than FZROX's 10.79% return.


FGTMX

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.13%
6M
3.42%
YTD
3.42%
1Y
7.96%
3Y*
9.70%
5Y*
3.98%
10Y*

FZROX

1D
-0.23%
1M
-1.10%
6M
10.79%
YTD
10.79%
1Y
22.20%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGTMX vs. FZROX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FGTMX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I
3.42%9.80%9.38%11.04%-13.18%3.85%2.31%14.20%-3.08%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
10.79%17.23%23.94%26.20%-19.21%26.00%20.51%31.15%-10.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FGTMX and FZROX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2018

0.54

The correlation between FGTMX and FZROX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGTMX vs. FZROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGTMX
FGTMX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FGTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FGTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FZROX
FZROX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FZROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZROX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FZROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZROX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGTMX vs. FZROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I (FGTMX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGTMXFZROXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.32

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

2.59

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.82

11.36

+5.46

FGTMX vs. FZROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGTMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the FZROX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGTMX and FZROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGTMX vs. FZROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGTMX drawdown since its inception was -22.37%, smaller than the maximum FZROX drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGTMX and FZROX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGTMXFZROXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.37%

-34.96%

+12.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.33%

-8.89%

+6.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.15%

-19.38%

+15.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.56%

-25.12%

+8.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-1.10%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-5.47%

+1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

2.02%

-1.54%

Volatility

FGTMX vs. FZROX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I (FGTMX) is 0.93%, while Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that FGTMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGTMXFZROXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

5.10%

-4.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.66%

10.20%

-7.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33%

12.90%

-9.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.39%

17.55%

-12.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.38%

20.10%

-13.72%

FGTMX vs. FZROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGTMX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FZROX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGTMX vs. FZROX - Dividend Comparison

FGTMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.38%, more than FZROX's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FGTMX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I
6.38%6.38%6.06%5.32%3.91%4.13%4.68%5.05%0.44%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
0.92%1.02%1.16%1.36%1.57%1.25%1.27%1.51%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGTMX and FZROX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FZROX has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to FGTMX (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGTMX dropped -22.37% vs FZROX's -34.96%.

FGTMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGTMX and FZROX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer