PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGTMX vs. FSPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGTMX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I (FGTMX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGTMX achieves a 2.41% return, which is significantly lower than FSPSX's 12.57% return.


FGTMX

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.98%
6M
1.55%
YTD
2.41%
1Y
7.02%
3Y*
8.88%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.44%

FSPSX

1D
2.56%
1M
1.98%
6M
7.21%
YTD
12.57%
1Y
26.28%
3Y*
16.54%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*
9.69%
ALL TIME*
8.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FGTMX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FGTMX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I
2.41%9.80%9.38%11.04%-13.18%3.85%2.31%14.20%-3.08%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
12.57%31.98%3.70%18.31%-14.23%11.45%8.16%22.03%-6.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FGTMX and FSPSX is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2018

0.55

The correlation between FGTMX and FSPSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGTMX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGTMX
FGTMX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FGTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FGTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPSX
FSPSX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FSPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGTMX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I (FGTMX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGTMXFSPSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.29

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

2.20

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.64

8.33

+5.31

FGTMX vs. FSPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGTMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the FSPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGTMX and FSPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGTMX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGTMX drawdown since its inception was -22.37%, smaller than the maximum FSPSX drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGTMX and FSPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGTMXFSPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.37%

-33.69%

+11.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.33%

-11.39%

+9.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.15%

-13.58%

+9.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.56%

-29.41%

+12.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

0.00%

-1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.49%

-6.49%

+3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

3.00%

-2.47%

Volatility

FGTMX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I (FGTMX) is 0.55%, while Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that FGTMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGTMXFSPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

4.57%

-4.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.63%

13.22%

-10.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35%

15.52%

-12.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.38%

16.12%

-10.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.35%

16.29%

-9.94%

FGTMX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGTMX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGTMX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison

FGTMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.94%, more than FSPSX's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGTMX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I
5.94%6.38%6.06%5.32%3.91%4.13%4.68%5.05%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
2.80%3.15%3.27%2.79%2.66%3.07%1.84%3.18%2.79%2.50%3.08%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGTMX and FSPSX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSPSX has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to FGTMX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGTMX dropped -22.37% vs FSPSX's -33.69%.

FGTMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGTMX and FSPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer