FGTIX vs. SPMO
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Growth Allocation Fund (FGTIX) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO).
FGTIX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Dec 30, 1996. SPMO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Momentum Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2015.
Performance
FGTIX vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGTIX vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGTIX Franklin Growth Allocation Fund | -4.56% | 17.82% | 15.13% | 17.62% | -17.12% | 16.39% | 14.54% | 21.85% | -6.45% | 18.06% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | -3.77% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGTIX achieves a -4.56% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's -3.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FGTIX has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 9.11%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.41% annualized return.
FGTIX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -4.56%
- 6M
- -1.79%
- 1Y
- 13.57%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- 9.11%
SPMO
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- -4.40%
- YTD
- -3.77%
- 6M
- -4.53%
- 1Y
- 23.97%
- 3Y*
- 29.27%
- 5Y*
- 17.66%
- 10Y*
- 17.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGTIX vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGTIX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGTIX vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
FGTIX
SPMO
FGTIX vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Growth Allocation Fund (FGTIX) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGTIX | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 1.06 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.60 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.24 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 1.96 | -0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.85 | 6.90 | -1.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGTIX | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.06 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.93 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.87 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.86 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGTIX and SPMO is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGTIX vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
FGTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.41%, more than SPMO's 0.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGTIX Franklin Growth Allocation Fund | 9.41% | 8.98% | 2.27% | 3.28% | 4.93% | 14.27% | 5.11% | 11.14% | 9.45% | 6.22% | 2.70% | 6.36% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.89% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Drawdowns
FGTIX vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGTIX drawdown since its inception was -46.40%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGTIX and SPMO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGTIX | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.40% | -30.95% | -15.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -12.70% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.56% | -22.74% | -8.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.56% | -30.95% | -0.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.16% | -7.31% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.21% | -4.66% | -5.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 3.60% | -1.50% |
Volatility
FGTIX vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Growth Allocation Fund (FGTIX) is 4.16%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.22%. This indicates that FGTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGTIX | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 7.22% | -3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.83% | 12.80% | -4.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.73% | 22.77% | -9.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.95% | 19.08% | -4.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 20.09% | -6.28% |