FGTIX vs. ^GSPC
FGTIX (Franklin Growth Allocation Fund) is Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, FGTIX returned 10.68%/yr vs 13.71%/yr for ^GSPC. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
FGTIX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGTIX achieves a 9.34% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 7.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FGTIX has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 10.68%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.71% annualized return.
FGTIX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 9.34%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- 1Y
- 22.52%
- 3Y*
- 17.07%
- 5Y*
- 9.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.68%
^GSPC
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- 7.60%
- 6M
- 6.59%
- 1Y
- 22.24%
- 3Y*
- 19.20%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.71%
FGTIX vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGTIX Franklin Growth Allocation Fund | 9.34% | 17.82% | 15.13% | 17.62% | -17.12% | 16.39% | 14.54% | 21.85% | -6.45% | 18.06% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 7.60% | 16.39% | 23.31% | 24.23% | -19.44% | 26.89% | 16.26% | 28.88% | -6.24% | 19.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGTIX and ^GSPC is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1996 | 0.89 |
The correlation between FGTIX and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGTIX vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
FGTIX
^GSPC
FGTIX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Growth Allocation Fund (FGTIX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGTIX | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.32 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 2.46 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.86 | 10.92 | +1.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGTIX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGTIX drawdown since its inception was -46.40%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGTIX and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGTIX | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.40% | -56.78% | +10.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.16% | -9.10% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.22% | -18.90% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.56% | -25.43% | -6.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.56% | -33.92% | +2.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -3.21% | +2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.14% | -10.71% | +0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 2.04% | -0.21% |
Volatility
FGTIX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Growth Allocation Fund (FGTIX) is 4.26%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that FGTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGTIX | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 4.89% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 9.93% | -0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.89% | 12.57% | -1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.10% | 17.00% | -1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 18.08% | -4.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, FGTIX and ^GSPC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
^GSPC has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to FGTIX (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGTIX dropped -46.40% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.
FGTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGTIX and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer