PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGSI vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGSI vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGSI achieves a 4.99% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return.


FGSI

1D
-0.54%
1M
3.18%
YTD
4.99%
6M
5.04%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USL

1D
1.55%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
63.07%
6M
59.66%
1Y
57.86%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGSI vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FGSI and USL is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

-0.18

FGSI vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGSI
USL

Technology

30.5%

-

Healthcare

17.6%

-

Financial Services

16.2%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%

-

Industrials

12.4%

-

Communication Services

5.7%

-

Energy

4.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.9%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FGSI
30.5%
USL

-

Healthcare

FGSI
17.6%
USL

-

Financial Services

FGSI
16.2%
USL
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FGSI
13.6%
USL

-

Industrials

FGSI
12.4%
USL

-

Communication Services

FGSI
5.7%
USL

-

Energy

FGSI
4.8%
USL

-

Consumer Defensive

FGSI
2.0%
USL

-

Basic Materials

FGSI
1.9%
USL

-

Real Estate

FGSI

-

USL

-

Utilities

FGSI

-

USL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGSI vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGSI

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGSI vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FGSI vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGSIUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.01

+0.84

Drawdowns

FGSI vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGSI drawdown since its inception was -8.25%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSI and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGSIUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-89.06%

+80.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-38.16%

+36.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-61.46%

+59.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.27%

Volatility

FGSI vs. USL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGSIUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.43%

28.54%

-16.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.43%

30.08%

-17.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.43%

32.35%

-19.92%

FGSI vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGSI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGSI vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

FGSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


FGSI and USL have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FGSI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FGSI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

FGSI has the higher dividend yield at 7.57%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

FGSI is categorized as Derivative Income, while USL is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FGSI and 0.88% for USL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGSI and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer