PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGSI vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGSI vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGSI achieves a 4.99% return, which is significantly higher than BUCK's 1.90% return.


FGSI

1D
-0.54%
1M
3.18%
YTD
4.99%
6M
5.04%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUCK

1D
0.02%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.90%
6M
2.09%
1Y
7.95%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGSI vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FGSI and BUCK is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.06

FGSI vs. BUCK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGSI
BUCK

Technology

30.5%

-

Healthcare

17.6%

-

Financial Services

16.2%
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%

-

Industrials

12.4%

-

Communication Services

5.7%

-

Energy

4.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.9%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FGSI
30.5%
BUCK

-

Healthcare

FGSI
17.6%
BUCK

-

Financial Services

FGSI
16.2%
BUCK
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FGSI
13.6%
BUCK

-

Industrials

FGSI
12.4%
BUCK

-

Communication Services

FGSI
5.7%
BUCK

-

Energy

FGSI
4.8%
BUCK

-

Consumer Defensive

FGSI
2.0%
BUCK

-

Basic Materials

FGSI
1.9%
BUCK

-

Real Estate

FGSI

-

BUCK

-

Utilities

FGSI

-

BUCK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGSI vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGSI

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGSI vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FGSI vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGSIBUCKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

1.47

-0.62

Drawdowns

FGSI vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGSI drawdown since its inception was -8.25%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSI and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGSIBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-5.43%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-0.04%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-0.49%

-1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

Volatility

FGSI vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGSIBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.43%

3.14%

+9.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.43%

3.49%

+8.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.43%

3.49%

+8.94%

FGSI vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGSI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGSI vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

FGSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, more than BUCK's 7.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.42%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
FGSI
First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF
7.57%4.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGSI and BUCK have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FGSI.

FGSI has the higher dividend yield at 7.57%, compared with 7.42% for BUCK.

FGSI is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FGSI and 0.35% for BUCK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGSI and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer