FGSI vs. AMDW

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FGSI (First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FGSI returned 11.13% vs 209.29% for AMDW. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FGSI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDW.

Performance

FGSI vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGSI achieves a 8.34% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 146.74% return.

FGSI

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 1.55%
• 6M: 6.78%
• YTD: 8.34%
• 1Y: 11.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.03%

AMDW

• 1D: -2.02%
• 1M: -10.13%
• 6M: 119.90%
• YTD: 146.74%
• 1Y: 209.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 229.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	$10.26M	$9.58M	$8.51M
FGSI First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF	$3.03K	$2.79K	$11.92K

FGSI vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FGSI First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF	8.34%	0.44%
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	146.74%	36.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FGSI and AMDW is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.36

FGSI vs. AMDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FGSI	AMDW
Technology	31.9%	19.3%
Healthcare	18.2%	-
Financial Services	16.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	13.3%	-
Industrials	11.3%	-
Communication Services	5.2%	-
Energy	4.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	-
Basic Materials	1.6%	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FGSI vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGSI

FGSI Risk / Return Rank: 34
FGSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FGSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
FGSI Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FGSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FGSI Martin Ratio Rank: 38

AMDW

AMDW Risk / Return Rank: 88
AMDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
AMDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
AMDW Omega Ratio Rank: 84
AMDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMDW Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGSI vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGSI	AMDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	2.36	-1.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.20	2.92	-1.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.36	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.23	5.83	-4.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.01	11.47	-7.46

FGSI vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGSI Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the AMDW Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGSI and AMDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGSI vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGSI drawdown since its inception was -8.25%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSI and AMDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGSI	AMDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.25%	-34.64%	+26.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.25%	-34.64%	+26.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-21.39%	+21.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.84%	-13.97%	+12.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.53%	17.59%	-15.06%

Volatility

FGSI vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) is 3.01%, while Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) has a volatility of 28.87%. This indicates that FGSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGSI	AMDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.01%	28.87%	-25.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.13%	67.40%	-57.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.64%	85.70%	-73.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.34%	85.05%	-72.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.34%	85.05%	-72.71%

FGSI vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGSI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGSI vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

FGSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.19%, less than AMDW's 53.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	53.42%	34.78%
FGSI First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF	8.19%	4.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGSI and AMDW in my portfolio?

FGSI and AMDW have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGSI or AMDW?

AMDW has higher volatility (28.87%) compared to FGSI (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGSI dropped -8.25% vs AMDW's -34.64%.

Which ETF is better, FGSI or AMDW?

On 1-year performance, AMDW leads with 209.29% vs 11.13% for FGSI. On fees, FGSI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, FGSI has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FGSI or AMDW?

Over the 1-year period, AMDW has performed better with a 209.29% return vs 11.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FGSI or AMDW?

FGSI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FGSI or AMDW?

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 53.42%, compared with 8.19% for FGSI.

What is the main difference between FGSI and AMDW?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FGSI and 0.99% for AMDW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.