PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGRU vs. CRCD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGRU vs. CRCD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long FIGR Daily Target ETF (FGRU) and T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FGRU

1D
3.04%
1M
-32.84%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRCD

1D
-0.24%
1M
24.92%
YTD
-88.04%
6M
-87.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGRU vs. CRCD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FGRU and CRCD is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026

-0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGRU vs. CRCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long FIGR Daily Target ETF (FGRU) and T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FGRU vs. CRCD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGRUCRCDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.43

-0.45

+0.02

Drawdowns

FGRU vs. CRCD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGRU drawdown since its inception was -57.59%, smaller than the maximum CRCD drawdown of -96.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRU and CRCD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGRUCRCDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.59%

-96.95%

+39.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.89%

-94.33%

+44.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.86%

-54.75%

+23.89%

Volatility

FGRU vs. CRCD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGRUCRCDDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

208.42%

203.94%

+4.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

208.42%

203.94%

+4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

208.42%

203.94%

+4.48%

FGRU vs. CRCD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FGRU and CRCD have an expense ratio of 1.50%.


Dividends

FGRU vs. CRCD - Dividend Comparison

Neither FGRU nor CRCD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FGRU and CRCD have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FGRU and CRCD have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

FGRU and CRCD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

FGRU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CRCD is Inverse Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGRU and CRCD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer