PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGRTX vs. FSRRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGRTX vs. FSRRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGRTX achieves a 9.28% return, which is significantly higher than FSRRX's 6.54% return. Over the past 10 years, FGRTX has outperformed FSRRX with an annualized return of 16.84%, while FSRRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.41% annualized return.


FGRTX

1D
-0.76%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
9.28%
6M
8.76%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
25.10%
5Y*
16.41%
10Y*
16.84%

FSRRX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
6.54%
6M
6.42%
1Y
12.72%
3Y*
9.30%
5Y*
5.94%
10Y*
5.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGRTX vs. FSRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGRTX
Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund
9.28%26.92%25.98%26.51%-8.98%26.29%12.96%31.07%-7.44%16.98%
FSRRX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund
6.54%10.45%5.84%4.59%-3.34%15.84%3.74%10.48%-3.99%3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FGRTX and FSRRX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2005

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between FGRTX and FSRRX has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGRTX vs. FSRRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGRTX
FGRTX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FGRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FGRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRRX
FSRRX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FSRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGRTX vs. FSRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGRTXFSRRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.49

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

4.65

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.42

18.60

-4.19

FGRTX vs. FSRRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGRTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the FSRRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGRTX and FSRRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGRTX vs. FSRRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGRTX drawdown since its inception was -56.17%, which is greater than FSRRX's maximum drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRTX and FSRRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGRTXFSRRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.17%

-33.42%

-22.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-2.69%

-6.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.51%

-5.80%

-12.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.35%

-12.78%

-10.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.18%

-19.93%

-15.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-2.69%

+1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.71%

-4.21%

-4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

0.67%

+1.35%

Volatility

FGRTX vs. FSRRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) at 1.35%. This indicates that FGRTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGRTXFSRRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

1.35%

+2.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

3.81%

+5.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.56%

4.88%

+7.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.76%

6.88%

+9.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.15%

6.73%

+11.42%

FGRTX vs. FSRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGRTX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGRTX vs. FSRRX - Dividend Comparison

FGRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, less than FSRRX's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGRTX
Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund
3.56%3.89%2.68%2.06%4.38%4.79%7.96%12.98%21.72%15.57%1.97%4.16%
FSRRX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund
4.21%4.68%4.82%5.29%7.31%5.35%2.25%3.05%9.39%1.57%2.34%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGRTX and FSRRX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGRTX has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to FSRRX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGRTX dropped -56.17% vs FSRRX's -33.42%.

FSRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGRTX and FSRRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer