FGRIX vs. FASMX
FGRIX (Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio) and FASMX (Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund) are both mutual funds - FGRIX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FASMX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, FGRIX returned 14.33%/yr vs 7.77%/yr for FASMX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FGRIX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for FASMX.
Performance
FGRIX vs. FASMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGRIX achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly lower than FASMX's 9.03% return. Over the past 10 years, FGRIX has outperformed FASMX with an annualized return of 14.33%, while FASMX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.77% annualized return.
FGRIX
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 7.63%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 23.41%
- 3Y*
- 20.80%
- 5Y*
- 13.55%
- 10Y*
- 14.33%
FASMX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 9.03%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- 20.66%
- 3Y*
- 13.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.77%
FGRIX vs. FASMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGRIX Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio | 7.63% | 21.59% | 22.10% | 18.63% | -4.98% | 25.84% | 7.98% | 30.22% | -8.94% | 16.88% |
FASMX Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund | 9.03% | 14.94% | 8.46% | 13.09% | -14.93% | 9.86% | 14.72% | 18.25% | -5.51% | 11.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGRIX and FASMX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 1988 | 0.90 |
The correlation between FGRIX and FASMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
FGRIX vs. FASMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FGRIX
FASMX
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
FGRIX
FASMX
Industrials
FGRIX
FASMX
Financial Services
FGRIX
FASMX
Energy
FGRIX
FASMX
Healthcare
FGRIX
FASMX
Consumer Defensive
FGRIX
FASMX
Communication Services
FGRIX
FASMX
Consumer Cyclical
FGRIX
FASMX
Utilities
FGRIX
FASMX
Real Estate
FGRIX
FASMX
Basic Materials
FGRIX
FASMX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGRIX vs. FASMX — Risk / Return Rank
FGRIX
FASMX
FGRIX vs. FASMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio (FGRIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGRIX | FASMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.27 | 2.65 | -0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.18 | 3.78 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.51 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 3.38 | -0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.11 | 14.80 | -2.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGRIX | FASMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 2.65 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.70 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 0.84 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.85 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
FGRIX vs. FASMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGRIX drawdown since its inception was -67.10%, which is greater than FASMX's maximum drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRIX and FASMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGRIX | FASMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.10% | -37.75% | -29.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.35% | -6.19% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.42% | -9.28% | -7.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.26% | -20.54% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.63% | -21.27% | -14.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | 0.00% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.12% | -4.12% | -6.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 1.41% | +0.58% |
Volatility
FGRIX vs. FASMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio (FGRIX) is 2.36%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX) has a volatility of 2.67%. This indicates that FGRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGRIX | FASMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.36% | 2.67% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.97% | 6.50% | +1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.64% | 7.91% | +2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.52% | 9.32% | +6.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 9.31% | +8.14% |
FGRIX vs. FASMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGRIX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than FASMX's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGRIX vs. FASMX - Dividend Comparison
FGRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.10%, more than FASMX's 6.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASMX Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund | 6.93% | 7.58% | 3.88% | 2.18% | 6.78% | 2.91% | 2.40% | 4.21% | 5.11% | 2.24% | 1.69% | 5.77% |
FGRIX Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio | 9.10% | 9.78% | 6.80% | 3.93% | 3.43% | 6.02% | 3.61% | 2.85% | 3.39% | 1.52% | 1.80% | 2.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGRIX and FASMX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FASMX has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to FGRIX (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGRIX dropped -67.10% vs FASMX's -37.75%.
FASMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGRIX and FASMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer