PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGR.PA vs. TEG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FGR.PA vs. TEG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Eiffage SA (FGR.PA) and TAG Immobilien AG (TEG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGR.PA achieves a 2.93% return, which is significantly lower than TEG.DE's 5.70% return. Over the past 10 years, FGR.PA has outperformed TEG.DE with an annualized return of 9.40%, while TEG.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 5.21% annualized return.


FGR.PA

1D
0.17%
1M
-2.22%
6M
0.30%
YTD
2.93%
1Y
7.45%
3Y*
13.18%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
9.40%

TEG.DE

1D
-0.51%
1M
6.17%
6M
-1.45%
YTD
5.70%
1Y
-3.62%
3Y*
17.17%
5Y*
-9.94%
10Y*
5.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGR.PA vs. TEG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGR.PA
Eiffage SA
2.93%50.01%-9.11%9.25%5.05%18.20%-22.51%43.56%-18.50%40.56%
TEG.DE
TAG Immobilien AG
5.70%-5.25%8.79%118.18%-71.51%-1.23%21.43%15.72%30.58%31.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FGR.PA and TEG.DE is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2006

0.25

The correlation between FGR.PA and TEG.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGR.PA vs. TEG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGR.PA
FGR.PA Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FGR.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGR.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGR.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FGR.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGR.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

TEG.DE
TEG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
TEG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
TEG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGR.PA vs. TEG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eiffage SA (FGR.PA) and TAG Immobilien AG (TEG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGR.PATEG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.01

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

-0.13

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.83

-0.26

+1.09

FGR.PA vs. TEG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGR.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is higher than the TEG.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGR.PA and TEG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGR.PA vs. TEG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGR.PA drawdown since its inception was -85.98%, roughly equal to the maximum TEG.DE drawdown of -90.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGR.PA and TEG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGR.PATEG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.98%

-90.11%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.11%

-23.04%

+5.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.41%

-30.36%

+9.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.78%

-78.01%

+57.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.28%

-78.01%

+24.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.92%

-42.70%

+28.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.14%

-27.66%

-7.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.87%

11.47%

-2.60%

Volatility

FGR.PA vs. TEG.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eiffage SA (FGR.PA) is 7.39%, while TAG Immobilien AG (TEG.DE) has a volatility of 10.75%. This indicates that FGR.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGR.PATEG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

10.75%

-3.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.78%

26.64%

-7.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.53%

31.65%

-7.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.72%

40.17%

-17.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.70%

31.95%

-6.25%

Dividends

FGR.PA vs. TEG.DE - Dividend Comparison

FGR.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than TEG.DE's 2.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGR.PA
Eiffage SA
3.96%3.84%4.84%3.71%3.37%3.32%0.00%2.35%2.74%1.64%2.26%2.02%
TEG.DE
TAG Immobilien AG
2.94%3.02%0.00%0.00%14.68%3.75%3.17%3.55%3.42%3.77%4.39%4.56%

Financials

FGR.PA vs. TEG.DE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eiffage SA and TAG Immobilien AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FGR.PA and TEG.DE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGR.PA and TEG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer