FGQI.L vs. FUQA.L
FGQI.L (Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD) and FUQA.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - FGQI.L is a Global Equity Income fund tracking the Fidelity Global Quality Income Index, while FUQA.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity US Quality Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FGQI.L returned 10.69%/yr vs 11.73%/yr for FUQA.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGQI.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FUQA.L.
Performance
FGQI.L vs. FUQA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FGQI.L is traded in USD, while FUQA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FUQA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGQI.L achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly higher than FUQA.L's 8.61% return.
FGQI.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 24.94%
- 3Y*
- 17.81%
- 5Y*
- 10.69%
- 10Y*
- —
FUQA.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 8.61%
- 6M
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- 23.70%
- 3Y*
- 17.86%
- 5Y*
- 11.73%
- 10Y*
- —
FGQI.L vs. FUQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGQI.L Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD | 9.49% | 20.05% | 11.82% | 18.07% | -10.84% | 22.20% | 10.14% | 27.80% | -7.55% | 16.78% |
FUQA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc | 8.61% | 16.04% | 17.51% | 17.75% | -10.69% | 26.66% | 11.54% | 32.33% | -4.62% | 15.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGQI.L and FUQA.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2017 | 0.71 |
The correlation between FGQI.L and FUQA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FGQI.L vs. FUQA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FGQI.L
FUQA.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
FGQI.L
FUQA.L
Financial Services
FGQI.L
FUQA.L
Industrials
FGQI.L
FUQA.L
Healthcare
FGQI.L
FUQA.L
Consumer Cyclical
FGQI.L
FUQA.L
Communication Services
FGQI.L
FUQA.L
Consumer Defensive
FGQI.L
FUQA.L
Energy
FGQI.L
FUQA.L
Basic Materials
FGQI.L
FUQA.L
Utilities
FGQI.L
FUQA.L
Real Estate
FGQI.L
FUQA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGQI.L vs. FUQA.L — Risk / Return Rank
FGQI.L
FUQA.L
FGQI.L vs. FUQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD (FGQI.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGQI.L | FUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.38 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 2.74 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.76 | 12.87 | -0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGQI.L | FUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 2.09 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.80 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.93 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
FGQI.L vs. FUQA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGQI.L drawdown since its inception was -35.04%, roughly equal to the maximum FUQA.L drawdown of -35.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGQI.L and FUQA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGQI.L | FUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.04% | -35.38% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.04% | -8.62% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.80% | -17.72% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.08% | -20.19% | -1.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -0.16% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -4.03% | -0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 1.84% | +0.11% |
Volatility
FGQI.L vs. FUQA.L - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD (FGQI.L) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) at 2.72%. This indicates that FGQI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGQI.L | FUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 2.72% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.16% | 8.82% | +0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.18% | 11.28% | +0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.99% | 14.69% | +0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 17.30% | -1.53% |
FGQI.L vs. FUQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGQI.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FUQA.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGQI.L vs. FUQA.L - Dividend Comparison
FGQI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, while FUQA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGQI.L Fidelity Global Quality Income UCITS ETF (Inc) USD | 1.80% | 1.81% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 2.77% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 2.78% | 1.50% |
FUQA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGQI.L and FUQA.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUQA.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUQA.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FGQI.L.
FGQI.L is categorized as Global Equity Income, while FUQA.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. FGQI.L tracks Fidelity Global Quality Income Index, while FUQA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FGQI.L and 0.25% for FUQA.L.
Find the right allocation for FGQI.L and FUQA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer