FGPMX vs. USG

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FGPMX (Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6) and USG (USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund) are both Gold funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FGPMX returned 46.26%/yr vs 23.45%/yr for USG. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FGPMX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for USG.

Performance

FGPMX vs. USG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX) and USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund (USG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGPMX achieves a -12.20% return, which is significantly lower than USG's -6.20% return.

FGPMX

• 1D: -2.45%
• 1M: -6.57%
• 6M: -19.67%
• YTD: -12.20%
• 1Y: 62.14%
• 3Y*: 46.26%
• 5Y*: 19.30%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.29%

USG

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -1.47%
• 6M: -11.69%
• YTD: -6.20%
• 1Y: 15.50%
• 3Y*: 23.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FGPMX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
USG USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund	$360.35K	$283.88K	$177.43K

FGPMX vs. USG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FGPMX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6	-12.20%	197.33%	18.11%	2.35%	-23.15%	3.73%
USG USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund	-6.20%	52.02%	23.70%	8.49%	2.12%	3.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FGPMX and USG is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021	0.65

The correlation between FGPMX and USG shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FGPMX vs. USG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGPMX

FGPMX Risk / Return Rank: 38
FGPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
FGPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FGPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
FGPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
FGPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

USG

USG Risk / Return Rank: 14
USG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
USG Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
USG Omega Ratio Rank: 19
USG Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
USG Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGPMX vs. USG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX) and USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund (USG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGPMX	USG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	0.63	+0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	0.95	+0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.14	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.74	0.63	+1.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.85	1.39	+2.46

FGPMX vs. USG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGPMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the USG Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGPMX and USG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGPMX vs. USG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGPMX drawdown since its inception was -48.71%, which is greater than USG's maximum drawdown of -24.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGPMX and USG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGPMX	USG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.71%	-24.86%	-23.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.34%	-24.86%	-12.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.34%	-24.86%	-12.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.77%	-23.35%	-11.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.12%	-4.95%	-13.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.80%	11.20%	+5.60%

Volatility

FGPMX vs. USG - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX) has a higher volatility of 13.37% compared to USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund (USG) at 5.82%. This indicates that FGPMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGPMX	USG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.37%	5.82%	+7.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.36%	19.72%	+18.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.92%	24.81%	+21.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.65%	16.23%	+18.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.83%	16.23%	+16.60%

FGPMX vs. USG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGPMX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than USG's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGPMX vs. USG - Dividend Comparison

FGPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.02%, less than USG's 29.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGPMX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6	11.02%	9.67%	12.41%	3.18%	0.00%	8.79%	10.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.82%
USG USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund	29.71%	27.33%	7.48%	8.16%	2.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGPMX and USG in my portfolio?

FGPMX and USG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGPMX or USG?

FGPMX has higher volatility (13.37%) compared to USG (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGPMX dropped -48.71% vs USG's -24.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.