PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGPMX vs. FRIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGPMX vs. FRIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX) and Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class (FRIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGPMX achieves a -1.71% return, which is significantly lower than FRIAX's 4.46% return.


FGPMX

1D
-1.39%
1M
-4.19%
YTD
-1.71%
6M
-5.43%
1Y
75.41%
3Y*
52.91%
5Y*
22.14%
10Y*

FRIAX

1D
-0.40%
1M
-0.73%
YTD
4.46%
6M
4.46%
1Y
12.75%
3Y*
10.07%
5Y*
6.40%
10Y*
7.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGPMX vs. FRIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGPMX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6
-1.71%197.33%18.11%2.35%-23.15%-3.66%44.76%52.07%-17.76%-10.66%
FRIAX
Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class
4.46%12.02%7.29%8.84%-5.36%17.51%3.72%16.02%-5.23%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FGPMX and FRIAX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2017

0.28

The correlation between FGPMX and FRIAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGPMX vs. FRIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGPMX
FGPMX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FGPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FGPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FRIAX
FRIAX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FRIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FRIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGPMX vs. FRIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX) and Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class (FRIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGPMXFRIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.55

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

4.18

-1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.12

15.79

-9.67

FGPMX vs. FRIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGPMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the FRIAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGPMX and FRIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGPMX vs. FRIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGPMX drawdown since its inception was -48.71%, which is greater than FRIAX's maximum drawdown of -43.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGPMX and FRIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGPMXFRIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.71%

-43.23%

-5.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.73%

-3.06%

-31.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.73%

-7.35%

-27.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.71%

-13.63%

-35.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.98%

-1.18%

-25.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.93%

-3.92%

-14.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.58%

0.81%

+11.77%

Volatility

FGPMX vs. FRIAX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX) has a higher volatility of 16.59% compared to Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class (FRIAX) at 1.39%. This indicates that FGPMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGPMXFRIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.59%

1.39%

+15.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.74%

3.82%

+33.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.22%

5.11%

+39.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.17%

7.94%

+26.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.65%

9.28%

+23.37%

FGPMX vs. FRIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGPMX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than FRIAX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGPMX vs. FRIAX - Dividend Comparison

FGPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.84%, more than FRIAX's 5.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGPMX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6
9.84%9.67%12.41%3.18%0.00%8.79%10.04%0.00%0.00%0.82%0.00%0.00%
FRIAX
Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class
5.75%5.75%5.74%5.67%5.24%6.70%5.37%5.25%5.80%5.20%4.92%5.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGPMX and FRIAX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGPMX has higher volatility (16.59%) compared to FRIAX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGPMX dropped -48.71% vs FRIAX's -43.23%.

FRIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGPMX and FRIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer