PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEURX vs. UNWPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEURX vs. UNWPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Eagle Gold Fund Class R6 (FEURX) and U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEURX achieves a -2.96% return, which is significantly lower than UNWPX's 7.34% return.


FEURX

1D
-1.12%
1M
-5.21%
YTD
-2.96%
6M
-6.97%
1Y
49.24%
3Y*
37.18%
5Y*
20.38%
10Y*

UNWPX

1D
-1.03%
1M
-9.86%
YTD
7.34%
6M
5.41%
1Y
82.24%
3Y*
33.44%
5Y*
4.34%
10Y*
3.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEURX vs. UNWPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEURX
First Eagle Gold Fund Class R6
-2.96%129.09%10.69%7.37%-1.26%-7.42%30.08%38.92%-15.55%-1.36%
UNWPX
U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund
7.34%136.32%2.07%-16.18%-32.95%-13.88%70.83%22.59%-31.49%-13.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FEURX and UNWPX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2017

0.78

The correlation between FEURX and UNWPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEURX vs. UNWPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEURX
FEURX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FEURX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEURX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEURX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FEURX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEURX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

UNWPX
UNWPX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
UNWPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNWPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNWPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
UNWPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNWPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEURX vs. UNWPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Eagle Gold Fund Class R6 (FEURX) and U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEURXUNWPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.31

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

2.85

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.26

9.41

-5.15

FEURX vs. UNWPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEURX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the UNWPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEURX and UNWPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEURX vs. UNWPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEURX drawdown since its inception was -36.99%, smaller than the maximum UNWPX drawdown of -83.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEURX and UNWPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEURXUNWPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.99%

-83.78%

+46.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.34%

-29.02%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.34%

-29.17%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.93%

-60.80%

+26.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.96%

-39.51%

+12.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.78%

-49.47%

+36.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.81%

8.77%

+3.04%

Volatility

FEURX vs. UNWPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Eagle Gold Fund Class R6 (FEURX) is 13.39%, while U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) has a volatility of 14.31%. This indicates that FEURX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UNWPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEURXUNWPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.39%

14.31%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.11%

37.62%

-3.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.83%

44.31%

-4.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.12%

31.80%

-2.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.20%

30.60%

-3.40%

FEURX vs. UNWPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEURX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than UNWPX's 1.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEURX vs. UNWPX - Dividend Comparison

FEURX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than UNWPX's 83.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEURX
First Eagle Gold Fund Class R6
1.29%1.26%5.39%1.17%0.00%1.30%1.53%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UNWPX
U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund
83.64%5.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%71.74%6.76%0.00%17.45%28.55%0.33%9.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEURX and UNWPX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UNWPX has higher volatility (14.31%) compared to FEURX (13.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEURX dropped -36.99% vs UNWPX's -83.78%.

UNWPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEURX and UNWPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer