PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGMNX vs. SNGVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGMNX vs. SNGVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity GNMA Fund (FGMNX) and SIT U.S. Government Securities Fund (SNGVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGMNX achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly higher than SNGVX's -0.22% return. Over the past 10 years, FGMNX has underperformed SNGVX with an annualized return of 1.07%, while SNGVX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.47% annualized return.


FGMNX

1D
-0.39%
1M
-1.26%
6M
-0.44%
YTD
0.02%
1Y
3.04%
3Y*
4.12%
5Y*
0.08%
10Y*
1.07%
ALL TIME*
4.23%

SNGVX

1D
-0.36%
1M
-0.85%
6M
-0.43%
YTD
-0.22%
1Y
2.06%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
1.12%
10Y*
1.47%
ALL TIME*
4.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FGMNX vs. SNGVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGMNX
Fidelity GNMA Fund
0.02%7.89%0.43%5.46%-11.52%-1.03%3.74%5.72%0.62%1.74%
SNGVX
SIT U.S. Government Securities Fund
-0.22%6.93%2.41%3.22%-4.80%-1.15%3.53%3.34%1.80%1.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FGMNX and SNGVX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1988

0.72

The correlation between FGMNX and SNGVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.88 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGMNX vs. SNGVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGMNX
FGMNX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FGMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FGMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SNGVX
SNGVX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SNGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SNGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGMNX vs. SNGVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity GNMA Fund (FGMNX) and SIT U.S. Government Securities Fund (SNGVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGMNXSNGVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.17

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

1.15

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.26

2.88

+1.38

FGMNX vs. SNGVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGMNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the SNGVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGMNX and SNGVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGMNX vs. SNGVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGMNX drawdown since its inception was -16.84%, which is greater than SNGVX's maximum drawdown of -9.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGMNX and SNGVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGMNXSNGVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.84%

-9.17%

-7.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.54%

-2.41%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.41%

-3.34%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.49%

-8.93%

-7.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.84%

-9.17%

-7.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-1.97%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-0.83%

-1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

0.96%

-0.03%

Volatility

FGMNX vs. SNGVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity GNMA Fund (FGMNX) has a higher volatility of 0.97% compared to SIT U.S. Government Securities Fund (SNGVX) at 0.74%. This indicates that FGMNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNGVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGMNXSNGVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.97%

0.74%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

2.29%

+0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

2.91%

+0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.28%

3.75%

+2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.69%

2.98%

+1.71%

FGMNX vs. SNGVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGMNX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SNGVX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGMNX vs. SNGVX - Dividend Comparison

FGMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than SNGVX's 3.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGMNX
Fidelity GNMA Fund
3.34%3.61%3.23%3.45%1.68%0.76%1.61%2.46%2.19%2.17%2.61%2.25%
SNGVX
SIT U.S. Government Securities Fund
3.87%3.76%3.78%3.23%1.70%0.75%1.40%2.18%2.05%1.60%1.63%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGMNX and SNGVX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGMNX has higher volatility (0.97%) compared to SNGVX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGMNX dropped -16.84% vs SNGVX's -9.17%.

FGMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGMNX and SNGVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer