PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNGVX vs. SIBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNGVX vs. SIBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SIT U.S. Government Securities Fund (SNGVX) and SIT Balanced Fund (SIBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNGVX achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than SIBAX's 5.45% return. Over the past 10 years, SNGVX has underperformed SIBAX with an annualized return of 1.56%, while SIBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.67% annualized return.


SNGVX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.36%
1Y
4.56%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
1.27%
10Y*
1.56%

SIBAX

1D
0.59%
1M
3.04%
YTD
5.45%
6M
5.19%
1Y
19.74%
3Y*
16.08%
5Y*
8.57%
10Y*
10.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNGVX vs. SIBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SNGVX
SIT U.S. Government Securities Fund
0.31%6.93%2.41%3.22%-4.80%-1.15%3.53%3.34%1.80%1.34%
SIBAX
SIT Balanced Fund
5.45%13.57%18.02%22.64%-20.90%17.10%20.75%20.71%-2.75%17.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SNGVX and SIBAX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1994

0.02

Over the past year, SNGVX and SIBAX have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNGVX vs. SIBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNGVX
SNGVX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SNGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
SNGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

SIBAX
SIBAX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SIBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SIBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNGVX vs. SIBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SIT U.S. Government Securities Fund (SNGVX) and SIT Balanced Fund (SIBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNGVXSIBAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.45

2.15

-0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.17

3.03

-0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

2.35

-0.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.73

9.67

-3.95

SNGVX vs. SIBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNGVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the SIBAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNGVX and SIBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNGVXSIBAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

2.15

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.69

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.88

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.46

0.64

+0.82

Drawdowns

SNGVX vs. SIBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNGVX drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, smaller than the maximum SIBAX drawdown of -40.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNGVX and SIBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNGVXSIBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.17%

-40.93%

+31.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.41%

-8.51%

+6.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.04%

-13.44%

+9.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.17%

-24.75%

+15.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.17%

-24.75%

+15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

0.00%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.83%

-7.75%

+6.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

2.07%

-1.29%

Volatility

SNGVX vs. SIBAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SIT U.S. Government Securities Fund (SNGVX) is 1.09%, while SIT Balanced Fund (SIBAX) has a volatility of 2.55%. This indicates that SNGVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNGVXSIBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

2.55%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.17%

7.23%

-5.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03%

9.41%

-6.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.72%

12.48%

-8.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.97%

12.23%

-9.26%

SNGVX vs. SIBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNGVX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than SIBAX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNGVX vs. SIBAX - Dividend Comparison

SNGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than SIBAX's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIBAX
SIT Balanced Fund
3.19%3.39%2.46%1.36%4.93%4.02%1.55%6.37%2.05%5.20%1.62%6.53%
SNGVX
SIT U.S. Government Securities Fund
3.82%3.76%3.78%3.23%1.70%0.75%1.40%2.18%2.05%1.60%1.63%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNGVX and SIBAX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIBAX has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to SNGVX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNGVX dropped -9.17% vs SIBAX's -40.93%.

SIBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNGVX and SIBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer