PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGM vs. HEZU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGM vs. HEZU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGM achieves a 3.68% return, which is significantly lower than HEZU's 13.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FGM has underperformed HEZU with an annualized return of 9.24%, while HEZU has yielded a comparatively higher 13.39% annualized return.


FGM

1D
1.96%
1M
-2.58%
YTD
3.68%
6M
4.40%
1Y
18.51%
3Y*
21.16%
5Y*
4.72%
10Y*
9.24%

HEZU

1D
1.06%
1M
3.04%
YTD
13.40%
6M
13.42%
1Y
26.69%
3Y*
19.44%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*
13.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGM vs. HEZU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGM
First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund
3.68%63.60%1.36%13.28%-30.46%6.10%17.26%20.77%-25.14%44.28%
HEZU
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF
13.40%25.93%10.63%22.98%-9.54%23.51%0.52%29.48%-10.23%14.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FGM and HEZU is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2014

0.73

The correlation between FGM and HEZU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

FGM vs. HEZU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGM
HEZU

Industrials

40.5%
21.0%

Consumer Cyclical

18.0%
8.4%

Real Estate

10.1%
0.9%

Basic Materials

8.5%
4.1%

Financial Services

8.3%
23.8%

Healthcare

6.3%
5.6%

Communication Services

3.2%
4.3%

Utilities

2.8%
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
5.5%

Energy

-

3.9%

Technology

-

16.1%

Industrials

FGM
40.5%
HEZU
21.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FGM
18.0%
HEZU
8.4%

Real Estate

FGM
10.1%
HEZU
0.9%

Basic Materials

FGM
8.5%
HEZU
4.1%

Financial Services

FGM
8.3%
HEZU
23.8%

Healthcare

FGM
6.3%
HEZU
5.6%

Communication Services

FGM
3.2%
HEZU
4.3%

Utilities

FGM
2.8%
HEZU
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

FGM
2.3%
HEZU
5.5%

Energy

FGM

-

HEZU
3.9%

Technology

FGM

-

HEZU
16.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGM vs. HEZU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGM
FGM Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGM Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

HEZU
HEZU Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
HEZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEZU Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
HEZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEZU Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGM vs. HEZU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGMHEZUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.32

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

2.45

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.11

9.61

-6.50

FGM vs. HEZU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGM Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the HEZU Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGM and HEZU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGM vs. HEZU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGM drawdown since its inception was -51.58%, which is greater than HEZU's maximum drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGM and HEZU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGMHEZUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.58%

-38.80%

-12.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.76%

-10.95%

-6.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.93%

-14.83%

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.18%

-22.79%

-27.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.58%

-38.80%

-12.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.83%

-1.13%

-6.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.71%

-5.81%

-8.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.97%

2.78%

+3.19%

Volatility

FGM vs. HEZU - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) at 5.41%. This indicates that FGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEZU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGMHEZUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.88%

5.41%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.69%

13.26%

+4.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.93%

15.55%

+5.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.56%

16.60%

+7.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.92%

18.17%

+4.75%

FGM vs. HEZU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGM has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than HEZU's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGM vs. HEZU - Dividend Comparison

FGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than HEZU's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGM
First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund
1.97%0.66%2.56%2.82%5.44%1.43%1.33%2.30%2.18%2.11%1.33%1.13%
HEZU
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF
2.58%2.92%2.77%2.52%23.26%2.25%2.32%5.40%3.48%1.92%3.11%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGM and HEZU have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGM has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to HEZU (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGM dropped -51.58% vs HEZU's -38.80%.

On 10-year performance, HEZU leads with 13.39% vs 9.24% for FGM. On fees, HEZU is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, HEZU has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HEZU has performed better with a 13.39% return vs 9.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HEZU is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FGM.

HEZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 1.97% for FGM.

FGM tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index, while HEZU tracks MSCI EMU 100% USD Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FGM and 0.52% for HEZU.

HEZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGM and HEZU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer