FGM vs. EWO
FGM (First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund) and EWO (iShares MSCI Austria ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - FGM tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index while EWO tracks the MSCI Austria Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FGM returned 8.09%/yr vs 14.00%/yr for EWO. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGM charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EWO.
Performance
FGM vs. EWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGM achieves a 4.13% return, which is significantly lower than EWO's 14.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FGM has underperformed EWO with an annualized return of 8.09%, while EWO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.00% annualized return.
FGM
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 2.88%
- YTD
- 4.13%
- 6M
- 9.75%
- 1Y
- 19.41%
- 3Y*
- 22.05%
- 5Y*
- 4.19%
- 10Y*
- 8.09%
EWO
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- 5.62%
- YTD
- 14.52%
- 6M
- 21.29%
- 1Y
- 43.71%
- 3Y*
- 33.18%
- 5Y*
- 14.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.00%
FGM vs. EWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund | 4.13% | 63.60% | 1.36% | 13.28% | -30.46% | 6.10% | 17.26% | 20.77% | -25.14% | 44.28% |
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF | 14.52% | 74.21% | 4.05% | 20.63% | -21.95% | 31.50% | -3.67% | 17.05% | -22.88% | 52.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGM and EWO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2012 | 0.71 |
The correlation between FGM and EWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
FGM vs. EWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FGM
EWO
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Technology
-
Industrials
FGM
EWO
Consumer Cyclical
FGM
EWO
Real Estate
FGM
EWO
Basic Materials
FGM
EWO
Financial Services
FGM
EWO
Healthcare
FGM
EWO
-
Communication Services
FGM
EWO
-
Utilities
FGM
EWO
Consumer Defensive
FGM
EWO
-
Energy
FGM
-
EWO
Technology
FGM
-
EWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGM vs. EWO — Risk / Return Rank
FGM
EWO
FGM vs. EWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) and iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGM | EWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.40 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 3.12 | -2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.48 | 10.58 | -7.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGM | EWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 2.38 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.68 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.61 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.27 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
FGM vs. EWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGM drawdown since its inception was -51.58%, smaller than the maximum EWO drawdown of -75.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGM and EWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGM | EWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.58% | -75.69% | +24.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.76% | -14.08% | -3.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.93% | -16.75% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.07% | -41.82% | -9.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.58% | -58.10% | +6.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.43% | -1.79% | -5.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.74% | -28.12% | +13.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.59% | 4.14% | +1.45% |
Volatility
FGM vs. EWO - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) at 6.71%. This indicates that FGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGM | EWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.14% | 6.71% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.09% | 15.08% | +2.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.51% | 18.52% | +1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 21.84% | +2.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.11% | 22.86% | +0.25% |
FGM vs. EWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGM has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than EWO's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGM vs. EWO - Dividend Comparison
FGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than EWO's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF | 2.08% | 2.38% | 7.40% | 5.66% | 4.75% | 2.42% | 0.98% | 3.11% | 4.04% | 2.03% | 1.99% | 1.51% |
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund | 0.64% | 0.66% | 2.56% | 2.82% | 5.44% | 1.43% | 1.33% | 2.30% | 2.18% | 2.11% | 1.33% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGM and EWO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FGM has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to EWO (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGM dropped -51.58% vs EWO's -75.69%.
On 10-year performance, EWO leads with 14.00% vs 8.09% for FGM. On fees, EWO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWO has been the lower-risk option at 6.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWO has performed better with a 14.00% return vs 8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FGM.
EWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.64% for FGM.
FGM tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index, while EWO tracks MSCI Austria Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FGM and 0.49% for EWO.
EWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGM and EWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer