FGLGX vs. LRGC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FGLGX (Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund) and LRGC (AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, FGLGX returned 32.08% vs 23.67% for LRGC. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FGLGX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for LRGC.

Performance

FGLGX vs. LRGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX) and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGLGX achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly higher than LRGC's 7.44% return.

FGLGX

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 3.30%
• YTD: 10.11%
• 6M: 12.09%
• 1Y: 32.08%
• 3Y*: 26.56%
• 5Y*: 16.96%
• 10Y*: 16.45%

LRGC

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 3.05%
• YTD: 7.44%
• 6M: 7.71%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGLGX vs. LRGC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FGLGX Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund	10.11%	28.57%	27.45%	7.91%
LRGC AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF	7.44%	16.23%	24.92%	9.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FGLGX and LRGC is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023	0.91

The correlation between FGLGX and LRGC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGLGX vs. LRGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGLGX

FGLGX Risk / Return Rank: 80
FGLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FGLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FGLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FGLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FGLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

LRGC

LRGC Risk / Return Rank: 57
LRGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
LRGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
LRGC Omega Ratio Rank: 59
LRGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
LRGC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGLGX vs. LRGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX) and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGLGX	LRGC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	2.00	+0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.71	2.77	+0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.36	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.50	2.38	+1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.03	9.89	+6.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGLGX vs. LRGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGLGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the LRGC Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGLGX and LRGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGLGX	LRGC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.70	2.00	+0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	1.45	-0.57

Drawdowns

FGLGX vs. LRGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGLGX drawdown since its inception was -36.42%, which is greater than LRGC's maximum drawdown of -19.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGLGX and LRGC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGLGX	LRGC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.42%	-19.38%	-17.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.43%	-10.00%	+0.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.21%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-0.67%	+0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.78%	-2.15%	-1.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	2.40%	-0.34%

Volatility

FGLGX vs. LRGC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX) and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) have volatilities of 2.89% and 2.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGLGX	LRGC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.89%	2.91%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.34%	9.09%	+0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.27%	11.88%	+0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.89%	15.20%	+1.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.37%	15.20%	+3.17%

FGLGX vs. LRGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGLGX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LRGC's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGLGX vs. LRGC - Dividend Comparison

FGLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.94%, more than LRGC's 0.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGLGX Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund	8.94%	9.84%	7.99%	5.29%	6.55%	9.22%	5.36%	7.25%	12.29%	4.61%	1.69%	5.94%
LRGC AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF	0.54%	0.58%	0.46%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGLGX and LRGC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FGLGX and LRGC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FGLGX or LRGC?

LRGC has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to FGLGX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGLGX dropped -36.42% vs LRGC's -19.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.