PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGLGX vs. FNCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGLGX vs. FNCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGLGX achieves a 10.45% return, which is significantly higher than FNCL's -0.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FGLGX has outperformed FNCL with an annualized return of 16.67%, while FNCL has yielded a comparatively lower 13.39% annualized return.


FGLGX

1D
0.99%
1M
1.38%
YTD
10.45%
6M
10.41%
1Y
31.68%
3Y*
25.81%
5Y*
17.87%
10Y*
16.67%

FNCL

1D
0.47%
1M
3.73%
YTD
-0.77%
6M
-2.03%
1Y
9.85%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
13.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGLGX vs. FNCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGLGX
Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund
10.45%28.57%27.45%24.80%-7.23%26.53%10.01%32.37%-8.95%16.64%
FNCL
Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF
-0.77%14.94%30.44%14.10%-12.28%34.92%-2.19%31.59%-13.44%19.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FGLGX and FNCL is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between FGLGX and FNCL has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGLGX vs. FNCL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGLGX
FGLGX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FGLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FGLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FNCL
FNCL Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FNCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNCL Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FNCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNCL Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGLGX vs. FNCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGLGXFNCLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.12

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

0.67

+2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.20

1.74

+13.46

FGLGX vs. FNCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGLGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the FNCL Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGLGX and FNCL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGLGX vs. FNCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGLGX drawdown since its inception was -36.42%, smaller than the maximum FNCL drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGLGX and FNCL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGLGXFNCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.42%

-44.38%

+7.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-14.78%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.75%

-17.29%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.21%

-25.68%

+4.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.42%

-44.38%

+7.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-3.79%

+3.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.77%

-6.90%

+3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

5.68%

-3.60%

Volatility

FGLGX vs. FNCL - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) have volatilities of 4.38% and 4.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGLGXFNCLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

4.21%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.99%

11.35%

-1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78%

14.96%

-2.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.95%

19.21%

-2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.40%

22.36%

-3.96%

FGLGX vs. FNCL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGLGX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FNCL's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FGLGX vs. FNCL - Dividend Comparison

FGLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.91%, more than FNCL's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGLGX
Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund
8.91%9.84%7.99%5.29%6.55%9.22%5.36%7.25%12.29%4.61%1.69%5.94%
FNCL
Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF
1.65%1.45%1.52%1.91%2.29%1.75%2.26%2.17%2.37%1.60%1.81%2.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGLGX and FNCL have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGLGX has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to FNCL (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGLGX dropped -36.42% vs FNCL's -44.38%.

FGLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGLGX and FNCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer