PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGLGX vs. FZALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGLGX vs. FZALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FGLGX having a 10.11% return and FZALX slightly higher at 10.54%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FGLGX having a 16.45% annualized return and FZALX not far ahead at 16.71%.


FGLGX

1D
-0.24%
1M
3.30%
YTD
10.11%
6M
12.09%
1Y
32.08%
3Y*
26.56%
5Y*
16.96%
10Y*
16.45%

FZALX

1D
-0.32%
1M
3.44%
YTD
10.54%
6M
12.47%
1Y
31.53%
3Y*
25.73%
5Y*
16.44%
10Y*
16.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGLGX vs. FZALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGLGX
Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund
10.11%28.57%27.45%24.80%-7.23%26.53%10.01%32.37%-8.95%16.64%
FZALX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z
10.54%27.07%26.13%26.63%-8.89%26.44%13.06%31.25%-7.31%18.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FGLGX and FZALX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2013

0.99

The correlation between FGLGX and FZALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGLGX vs. FZALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGLGX
FGLGX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FGLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FGLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FZALX
FZALX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FZALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZALX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FZALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZALX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGLGX vs. FZALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGLGXFZALXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.49

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

3.61

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.03

16.39

-0.36

FGLGX vs. FZALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGLGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the FZALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGLGX and FZALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGLGXFZALXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

2.71

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

0.99

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.92

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.86

+0.02

Drawdowns

FGLGX vs. FZALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGLGX drawdown since its inception was -36.42%, roughly equal to the maximum FZALX drawdown of -35.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGLGX and FZALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGLGXFZALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.42%

-35.23%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-8.99%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.75%

-18.49%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.21%

-23.25%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.42%

-35.23%

-1.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.32%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-3.78%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

1.98%

+0.08%

Volatility

FGLGX vs. FZALX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX) has a higher volatility of 2.89% compared to Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) at 2.73%. This indicates that FGLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGLGXFZALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

2.73%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

9.06%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

11.98%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.89%

16.70%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.37%

18.14%

+0.23%

FGLGX vs. FZALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGLGX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FZALX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGLGX vs. FZALX - Dividend Comparison

FGLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.94%, more than FZALX's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGLGX
Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund
8.94%9.84%7.99%5.29%6.55%9.22%5.36%7.25%12.29%4.61%1.69%5.94%
FZALX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z
3.65%4.04%2.83%2.17%4.51%4.92%8.14%13.19%21.94%16.56%2.12%4.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FGLGX and FZALX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FGLGX has higher volatility (2.89%) compared to FZALX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGLGX dropped -36.42% vs FZALX's -35.23%.

FZALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGLGX and FZALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer