FGIAX vs. FMIEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX).
FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. FMIEX is managed by Wasatch. It was launched on Sep 25, 1996.
Performance
FGIAX vs. FMIEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGIAX vs. FMIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
FMIEX Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares | 7.66% | 30.93% | 8.66% | 5.67% | -0.12% | 25.11% | 2.04% | 17.27% | -5.67% | 11.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGIAX achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly higher than FMIEX's 7.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FGIAX has underperformed FMIEX with an annualized return of 8.78%, while FMIEX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.20% annualized return.
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
FMIEX
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -3.71%
- YTD
- 7.66%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 26.75%
- 3Y*
- 17.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.77%
- 10Y*
- 11.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGIAX vs. FMIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGIAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than FMIEX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGIAX vs. FMIEX — Risk / Return Rank
FGIAX
FMIEX
FGIAX vs. FMIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGIAX | FMIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 2.22 | -0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.30 | 2.97 | -0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.44 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 2.83 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.62 | 13.12 | -0.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGIAX | FMIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 2.22 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.93 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.71 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.59 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGIAX and FMIEX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGIAX vs. FMIEX - Dividend Comparison
FGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%, more than FMIEX's 4.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
FMIEX Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares | 4.88% | 5.76% | 9.02% | 3.27% | 8.54% | 4.34% | 1.74% | 3.82% | 18.46% | 16.45% | 5.16% | 11.75% |
Drawdowns
FGIAX vs. FMIEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGIAX drawdown since its inception was -49.35%, roughly equal to the maximum FMIEX drawdown of -49.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIAX and FMIEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGIAX | FMIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.35% | -49.85% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -9.34% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.08% | -18.63% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.02% | -39.33% | +1.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.06% | -4.40% | +1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -6.61% | -0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 2.06% | -0.27% |
Volatility
FGIAX vs. FMIEX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX) at 3.91%. This indicates that FGIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGIAX | FMIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 3.91% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.07% | 6.85% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 11.87% | +0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.08% | 12.77% | +0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 15.73% | -0.56% |