FGHMX vs. PRMTX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FGHMX (Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C) and PRMTX (T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund) are both Communications Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FGHMX returned 11.77%/yr vs 5.29%/yr for PRMTX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FGHMX charges 1.78%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for PRMTX.

Performance

FGHMX vs. PRMTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C (FGHMX) and T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund (PRMTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGHMX achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly higher than PRMTX's 0.18% return.

FGHMX

• 1D: -2.59%
• 1M: -4.20%
• YTD: 5.72%
• 6M: 5.46%
• 1Y: 29.44%
• 3Y*: 30.68%
• 5Y*: 11.77%
• 10Y*: —

PRMTX

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: -1.77%
• YTD: 0.18%
• 6M: -0.34%
• 1Y: -0.39%
• 3Y*: 21.97%
• 5Y*: 5.29%
• 10Y*: 15.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGHMX vs. PRMTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FGHMX Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C	5.72%	34.91%	34.57%	55.30%	-38.91%	14.78%	34.11%	31.72%	-7.48%
PRMTX T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund	0.18%	6.86%	48.75%	39.30%	-40.90%	9.81%	53.69%	35.69%	-6.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FGHMX and PRMTX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2018	0.88

The correlation between FGHMX and PRMTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGHMX vs. PRMTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGHMX

FGHMX Risk / Return Rank: 31
FGHMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FGHMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
FGHMX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FGHMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FGHMX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

PRMTX

PRMTX Risk / Return Rank: 3
PRMTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
PRMTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
PRMTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
PRMTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
PRMTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGHMX vs. PRMTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C (FGHMX) and T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund (PRMTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGHMX	PRMTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	0.07	+1.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	0.20	+1.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.02	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	0.06	+1.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.54	0.14	+6.40

FGHMX vs. PRMTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGHMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the PRMTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGHMX and PRMTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGHMX vs. PRMTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGHMX drawdown since its inception was -48.03%, smaller than the maximum PRMTX drawdown of -66.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGHMX and PRMTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGHMX	PRMTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.03%	-66.30%	+18.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.05%	-17.29%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.32%	-20.69%	-2.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.03%	-47.17%	-0.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.41%	-7.72%	+1.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.14%	-13.94%	+2.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.67%	7.39%	-2.72%

Volatility

FGHMX vs. PRMTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C (FGHMX) and T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund (PRMTX) have volatilities of 6.59% and 6.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGHMX	PRMTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.59%	6.66%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.92%	12.36%	+2.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.58%	15.64%	+3.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.37%	21.67%	+1.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.95%	20.98%	+2.97%

FGHMX vs. PRMTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGHMX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than PRMTX's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGHMX vs. PRMTX - Dividend Comparison

FGHMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.81%, less than PRMTX's 25.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGHMX Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C	12.81%	7.17%	7.20%	0.00%	0.00%	5.54%	3.81%	35.35%	8.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRMTX T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund	25.18%	25.23%	14.78%	7.74%	17.50%	8.35%	5.29%	2.45%	1.28%	2.35%	2.24%	3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGHMX and PRMTX in my portfolio?

FGHMX and PRMTX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGHMX or PRMTX?

PRMTX has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to FGHMX (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGHMX dropped -48.03% vs PRMTX's -66.30%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGHMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.