FGHMX vs. FGJMX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FGHMX (Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C) and FGJMX (Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class I) are both Communications Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FGHMX returned 13.08%/yr vs 14.40%/yr for FGJMX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FGHMX charges 1.78%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FGJMX.

Performance

FGHMX vs. FGJMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C (FGHMX) and Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class I (FGJMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FGHMX having a 10.26% return and FGJMX slightly higher at 10.72%.

FGHMX

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: 3.36%
• YTD: 10.26%
• 6M: 12.06%
• 1Y: 39.64%
• 3Y*: 33.29%
• 5Y*: 13.08%
• 10Y*: —

FGJMX

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 3.45%
• YTD: 10.72%
• 6M: 12.62%
• 1Y: 41.04%
• 3Y*: 34.97%
• 5Y*: 14.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGHMX vs. FGJMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FGHMX Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C	10.26%	34.91%	34.57%	55.30%	-38.91%	14.78%	34.11%	31.72%	-7.48%
FGJMX Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class I	10.72%	37.24%	35.98%	56.89%	-38.29%	15.96%	35.51%	33.18%	-7.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FGHMX and FGJMX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2018	1.00

The correlation between FGHMX and FGJMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGHMX vs. FGJMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGHMX

FGHMX Risk / Return Rank: 47
FGHMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
FGHMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FGHMX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
FGHMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
FGHMX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

FGJMX

FGJMX Risk / Return Rank: 50
FGJMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FGJMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
FGJMX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FGJMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
FGJMX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGHMX vs. FGJMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C (FGHMX) and Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class I (FGJMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGHMX	FGJMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	2.25	-0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	3.04	-0.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.39	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.46	2.56	-0.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.28	9.71	-0.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGHMX vs. FGJMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGHMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the FGJMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGHMX and FGJMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGHMX	FGJMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.18	2.25	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.62	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.83	-0.06

Drawdowns

FGHMX vs. FGJMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGHMX drawdown since its inception was -48.03%, roughly equal to the maximum FGJMX drawdown of -47.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGHMX and FGJMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGHMX	FGJMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.03%	-47.41%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.05%	-16.91%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.32%	-23.20%	-0.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.03%	-47.41%	-0.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.39%	-2.39%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.19%	-10.75%	-0.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.51%	4.46%	+0.05%

Volatility

FGHMX vs. FGJMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C (FGHMX) and Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class I (FGJMX) have volatilities of 4.63% and 4.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGHMX	FGJMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.63%	4.62%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.89%	13.88%	+0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.03%	19.03%	0.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.24%	23.26%	-0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.94%	23.96%	-0.02%

FGHMX vs. FGJMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGHMX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FGJMX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGHMX vs. FGJMX - Dividend Comparison

FGHMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.29%, more than FGJMX's 12.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FGHMX Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C	12.29%	7.17%	7.20%	0.00%	0.00%	5.54%	3.81%	35.35%	8.76%
FGJMX Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class I	12.15%	8.34%	7.12%	0.00%	0.00%	5.92%	3.74%	35.50%	8.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGHMX and FGJMX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, FGHMX and FGJMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FGHMX or FGJMX?

FGHMX has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to FGJMX (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGHMX dropped -48.03% vs FGJMX's -47.41%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGJMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.