FGHMX vs. FBGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C (FGHMX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX).
FGHMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 30, 2018. FBGRX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1987.
Performance
FGHMX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGHMX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGHMX Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C | -11.91% | 34.91% | 34.57% | 55.30% | -38.91% | 14.78% | 34.11% | 31.72% | -7.48% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | -11.15% | 19.91% | 39.77% | 55.61% | -38.45% | 22.64% | 62.20% | 33.43% | -5.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGHMX achieves a -11.91% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's -11.15% return.
FGHMX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -11.56%
- YTD
- -11.91%
- 6M
- -9.64%
- 1Y
- 25.48%
- 3Y*
- 27.13%
- 5Y*
- 9.79%
- 10Y*
- —
FBGRX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -8.97%
- YTD
- -11.15%
- 6M
- -8.04%
- 1Y
- 22.53%
- 3Y*
- 24.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.15%
- 10Y*
- 18.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGHMX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGHMX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGHMX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank
FGHMX
FBGRX
FGHMX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C (FGHMX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGHMX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | 0.91 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.66 | 1.43 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.20 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 1.36 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.81 | 5.44 | -0.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGHMX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 0.91 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.45 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGHMX and FBGRX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGHMX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison
FGHMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, more than FBGRX's 2.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGHMX Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C | 8.14% | 7.17% | 7.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.54% | 3.81% | 35.35% | 8.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 2.14% | 1.90% | 5.95% | 0.93% | 0.57% | 8.73% | 6.40% | 3.70% | 6.32% | 4.23% | 4.05% | 5.30% |
Drawdowns
FGHMX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGHMX drawdown since its inception was -48.03%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGHMX and FBGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGHMX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.03% | -58.64% | +10.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.05% | -13.89% | -3.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.03% | -43.08% | -4.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.05% | -12.65% | -4.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.39% | -12.58% | +1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 3.47% | +0.99% |
Volatility
FGHMX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C (FGHMX) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) at 6.13%. This indicates that FGHMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGHMX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.08% | 6.13% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.80% | 13.36% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.01% | 24.63% | -1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.13% | 24.86% | -1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.00% | 23.59% | +0.41% |