FGDKX vs. VTI
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund Class K (FGDKX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI).
FGDKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008. VTI is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Total Market Index. It was launched on Jun 27, 2016.
Performance
FGDKX vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGDKX vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGDKX Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund Class K | -4.14% | 15.23% | 30.30% | 35.73% | -24.34% | 23.03% | 43.54% | 33.91% | -0.20% | 34.68% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | -3.13% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGDKX achieves a -4.14% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's -3.13% return. Over the past 10 years, FGDKX has outperformed VTI with an annualized return of 17.24%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively lower 13.75% annualized return.
FGDKX
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -2.66%
- YTD
- -4.14%
- 6M
- -3.92%
- 1Y
- 18.76%
- 3Y*
- 21.05%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- 17.24%
VTI
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- YTD
- -3.13%
- 6M
- -1.24%
- 1Y
- 17.86%
- 3Y*
- 18.10%
- 5Y*
- 10.66%
- 10Y*
- 13.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGDKX vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGDKX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGDKX vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
FGDKX
VTI
FGDKX vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund Class K (FGDKX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGDKX | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 0.94 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 1.47 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.22 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 1.53 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.56 | 7.16 | -1.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGDKX | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 0.94 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.62 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.75 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.48 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGDKX and VTI is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGDKX vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
FGDKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than VTI's 1.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGDKX Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund Class K | 1.72% | 1.65% | 12.82% | 2.63% | 3.69% | 13.53% | 9.71% | 4.37% | 5.13% | 4.92% | 0.15% | 0.28% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.16% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Drawdowns
FGDKX vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGDKX drawdown since its inception was -55.39%, roughly equal to the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGDKX and VTI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGDKX | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.39% | -55.45% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.51% | -8.92% | -3.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.75% | -25.36% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.09% | -35.00% | +3.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.55% | -5.39% | -2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.74% | -8.08% | -0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 2.62% | +1.04% |
Volatility
FGDKX vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund Class K (FGDKX) has a higher volatility of 7.81% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 5.41%. This indicates that FGDKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGDKX | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.81% | 5.41% | +2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.39% | 9.75% | +3.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.25% | 19.02% | +3.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.33% | 17.40% | +2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.53% | 18.28% | +2.25% |