FGDKX vs. VTI
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund Class K (FGDKX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI).
FGDKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008. VTI is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Total Market Index. It was launched on Jun 27, 2016.
Performance
FGDKX vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGDKX vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGDKX Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund Class K | -5.37% | 15.23% | 30.30% | 35.73% | -24.34% | 23.03% | 43.54% | 33.91% | -0.20% | 34.68% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | -3.29% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGDKX achieves a -5.37% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's -3.29% return. Over the past 10 years, FGDKX has outperformed VTI with an annualized return of 17.09%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively lower 13.69% annualized return.
FGDKX
- 1D
- 4.32%
- 1M
- -5.35%
- YTD
- -5.37%
- 6M
- -4.80%
- 1Y
- 18.23%
- 3Y*
- 20.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.37%
- 10Y*
- 17.09%
VTI
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- -3.29%
- 6M
- -1.26%
- 1Y
- 18.60%
- 3Y*
- 18.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.63%
- 10Y*
- 13.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGDKX vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGDKX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGDKX vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
FGDKX
VTI
FGDKX vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund Class K (FGDKX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGDKX | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 0.98 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.35 | 1.52 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.23 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 1.54 | -0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.39 | 7.30 | -2.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGDKX | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.98 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.61 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.75 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.48 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGDKX and VTI is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGDKX vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
FGDKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than VTI's 1.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGDKX Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund Class K | 1.74% | 1.65% | 12.82% | 2.63% | 3.69% | 13.53% | 9.71% | 4.37% | 5.13% | 4.92% | 0.15% | 0.28% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.17% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Drawdowns
FGDKX vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGDKX drawdown since its inception was -55.39%, roughly equal to the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGDKX and VTI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGDKX | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.39% | -55.45% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.05% | -12.30% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.75% | -25.36% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.09% | -35.00% | +3.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.74% | -5.54% | -3.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.74% | -8.08% | -0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 2.60% | +1.03% |
Volatility
FGDKX vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund Class K (FGDKX) has a higher volatility of 7.78% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 5.48%. This indicates that FGDKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGDKX | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.78% | 5.48% | +2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.34% | 9.75% | +3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.22% | 19.02% | +3.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.34% | 17.41% | +2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.53% | 18.29% | +2.24% |