PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGDKX vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGDKX vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund Class K (FGDKX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGDKX achieves a 12.07% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 23.32% return. Over the past 10 years, FGDKX has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 19.36%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.49% annualized return.


FGDKX

1D
-0.88%
1M
0.36%
YTD
12.07%
6M
10.87%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
23.61%
5Y*
13.62%
10Y*
19.36%

VGT

1D
-3.68%
1M
0.28%
YTD
23.32%
6M
21.50%
1Y
46.82%
3Y*
30.13%
5Y*
19.51%
10Y*
25.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGDKX vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGDKX
Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund Class K
12.07%15.23%30.30%35.73%-24.34%23.03%43.54%33.91%-0.20%34.68%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
23.32%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FGDKX and VGT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2008

0.92

The correlation between FGDKX and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGDKX vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGDKX
FGDKX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FGDKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGDKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGDKX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FGDKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGDKX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGDKX vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund Class K (FGDKX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGDKXVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.35

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.87

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.13

8.76

-0.64

FGDKX vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGDKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGDKX and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGDKX vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGDKX drawdown since its inception was -55.39%, roughly equal to the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGDKX and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGDKXVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.39%

-54.63%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.51%

-16.40%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.41%

-27.23%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.75%

-35.07%

+5.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.09%

-35.07%

+3.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.96%

-7.71%

+4.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.65%

-7.95%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

5.36%

-1.99%

Volatility

FGDKX vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund Class K (FGDKX) is 7.03%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that FGDKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGDKXVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.03%

11.39%

-4.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.15%

18.58%

-4.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.51%

22.72%

-5.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.56%

25.55%

-4.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.69%

24.77%

-4.08%

FGDKX vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGDKX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGDKX vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

FGDKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGDKX
Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund Class K
1.47%1.65%12.82%2.63%3.69%13.53%9.71%4.37%5.13%4.92%0.15%0.28%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGDKX and VGT have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to FGDKX (7.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGDKX dropped -55.39% vs VGT's -54.63%.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGDKX and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer