PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGDIX vs. OCMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGDIX vs. OCMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX) and OCM Gold Fund (OCMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGDIX achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly lower than OCMGX's 8.44% return. Over the past 10 years, FGDIX has underperformed OCMGX with an annualized return of 12.30%, while OCMGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.54% annualized return.


FGDIX

1D
1.19%
1M
3.81%
YTD
5.38%
6M
12.25%
1Y
61.65%
3Y*
40.60%
5Y*
16.54%
10Y*
12.30%

OCMGX

1D
0.78%
1M
4.37%
YTD
8.44%
6M
18.43%
1Y
72.01%
3Y*
51.92%
5Y*
21.00%
10Y*
17.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGDIX vs. OCMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGDIX
Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I
5.38%142.97%14.91%-0.39%-13.42%-10.45%26.84%35.51%-12.96%8.59%
OCMGX
OCM Gold Fund
8.44%167.05%23.15%4.21%-17.71%-9.67%44.28%56.74%-13.84%9.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FGDIX and OCMGX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2005

0.97

The correlation between FGDIX and OCMGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGDIX vs. OCMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGDIX
FGDIX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FGDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FGDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

OCMGX
OCMGX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
OCMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
OCMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGDIX vs. OCMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX) and OCM Gold Fund (OCMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGDIXOCMGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.32

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

2.70

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

7.56

-2.15

FGDIX vs. OCMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGDIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the OCMGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGDIX and OCMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGDIXOCMGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

1.92

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.62

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.52

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.12

+0.03

Drawdowns

FGDIX vs. OCMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGDIX drawdown since its inception was -77.15%, smaller than the maximum OCMGX drawdown of -84.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGDIX and OCMGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGDIXOCMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.15%

-84.47%

+7.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.85%

-27.33%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.85%

-27.33%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.94%

-45.55%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.57%

-45.55%

-5.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.82%

-17.31%

-5.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.81%

-41.16%

+1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.40%

9.73%

+1.67%

Volatility

FGDIX vs. OCMGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX) has a higher volatility of 14.88% compared to OCM Gold Fund (OCMGX) at 13.65%. This indicates that FGDIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OCMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGDIXOCMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.88%

13.65%

+1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.11%

31.50%

+3.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.06%

38.74%

+4.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.60%

34.33%

-0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.10%

33.72%

-0.62%

FGDIX vs. OCMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGDIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than OCMGX's 2.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGDIX vs. OCMGX - Dividend Comparison

FGDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, less than OCMGX's 6.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGDIX
Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I
4.78%2.10%3.58%0.97%0.36%1.59%4.40%0.41%0.00%0.23%3.65%0.00%
OCMGX
OCM Gold Fund
6.00%6.50%2.88%0.00%0.05%1.07%0.98%6.33%26.98%7.19%19.53%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FGDIX and OCMGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FGDIX has higher volatility (14.88%) compared to OCMGX (13.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGDIX dropped -77.15% vs OCMGX's -84.47%.

OCMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGDIX and OCMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer