PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGDIX vs. GOLDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGDIX vs. GOLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX) and Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGDIX achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly higher than GOLDX's 2.61% return. Over the past 10 years, FGDIX has underperformed GOLDX with an annualized return of 12.30%, while GOLDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.69% annualized return.


FGDIX

1D
1.19%
1M
3.81%
YTD
5.38%
6M
12.25%
1Y
61.65%
3Y*
40.60%
5Y*
16.54%
10Y*
12.30%

GOLDX

1D
1.53%
1M
1.53%
YTD
2.61%
6M
10.56%
1Y
70.29%
3Y*
46.09%
5Y*
21.33%
10Y*
14.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGDIX vs. GOLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGDIX
Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I
5.38%142.97%14.91%-0.39%-13.42%-10.45%26.84%35.51%-12.96%8.59%
GOLDX
Gabelli Gold Fund
2.61%165.59%14.92%7.85%-11.02%-8.97%26.30%43.94%-14.80%6.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FGDIX and GOLDX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2005

0.98

The correlation between FGDIX and GOLDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGDIX vs. GOLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGDIX
FGDIX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FGDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FGDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

GOLDX
GOLDX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GOLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
GOLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGDIX vs. GOLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX) and Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGDIXGOLDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.30

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

2.24

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

5.99

-0.59

FGDIX vs. GOLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGDIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the GOLDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGDIX and GOLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGDIXGOLDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

1.69

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.66

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.46

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.23

-0.08

Drawdowns

FGDIX vs. GOLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGDIX drawdown since its inception was -77.15%, which is greater than GOLDX's maximum drawdown of -73.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGDIX and GOLDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGDIXGOLDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.15%

-73.40%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.85%

-31.96%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.85%

-31.96%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.94%

-44.73%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.57%

-49.42%

-1.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.82%

-24.80%

+1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.81%

-34.50%

-5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.40%

11.90%

-0.50%

Volatility

FGDIX vs. GOLDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX) and Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) have volatilities of 14.88% and 14.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGDIXGOLDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.88%

14.37%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.11%

35.55%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.06%

42.62%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.60%

32.55%

+1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.10%

32.11%

+0.99%

FGDIX vs. GOLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGDIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than GOLDX's 1.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGDIX vs. GOLDX - Dividend Comparison

FGDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, less than GOLDX's 15.17% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FGDIX
Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I
4.78%2.10%3.58%0.97%0.36%1.59%4.40%0.41%0.00%0.23%3.65%
GOLDX
Gabelli Gold Fund
15.17%15.57%2.11%1.13%0.00%0.00%1.69%0.83%0.34%0.51%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FGDIX and GOLDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FGDIX has higher volatility (14.88%) compared to GOLDX (14.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGDIX dropped -77.15% vs GOLDX's -73.40%.

GOLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGDIX and GOLDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer