FGD vs. UFO
FGD (First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund) and UFO (Procure Space ETF) are both Global Equities funds - FGD tracks the Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index while UFO tracks the S-Network Space Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FGD returned 10.37%/yr vs 15.60%/yr for UFO. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UFO.
Performance
FGD vs. UFO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGD achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly lower than UFO's 49.39% return.
FGD
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- YTD
- 11.09%
- 6M
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- 33.36%
- 3Y*
- 22.45%
- 5Y*
- 10.37%
- 10Y*
- 9.79%
UFO
- 1D
- -5.68%
- 1M
- 12.53%
- YTD
- 49.39%
- 6M
- 71.06%
- 1Y
- 135.88%
- 3Y*
- 46.01%
- 5Y*
- 15.60%
- 10Y*
- —
FGD vs. UFO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund | 11.09% | 44.42% | 5.71% | 8.20% | -7.25% | 20.83% | -5.23% | 9.62% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 49.39% | 67.36% | 27.22% | -2.34% | -25.85% | 7.17% | -2.15% | 5.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGD and UFO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019 | 0.61 |
The correlation between FGD and UFO shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FGD vs. UFO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FGD
UFO
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Energy
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
FGD
UFO
-
Industrials
FGD
UFO
Energy
FGD
UFO
-
Communication Services
FGD
UFO
Consumer Defensive
FGD
UFO
-
Consumer Cyclical
FGD
UFO
-
Basic Materials
FGD
UFO
-
Utilities
FGD
UFO
-
Real Estate
FGD
UFO
-
Technology
FGD
UFO
Healthcare
FGD
-
UFO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGD vs. UFO — Risk / Return Rank
FGD
UFO
FGD vs. UFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGD | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.48 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 6.23 | -2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.03 | 20.29 | -8.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGD | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 3.59 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.52 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.46 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
FGD vs. UFO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGD drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than UFO's maximum drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGD and UFO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGD | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.05% | -50.33% | -17.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | -21.95% | +12.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.50% | -25.91% | +14.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | -50.33% | +21.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.05% | -14.84% | +12.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.57% | -21.82% | +9.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 6.72% | -3.94% |
Volatility
FGD vs. UFO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) is 3.20%, while Procure Space ETF (UFO) has a volatility of 16.64%. This indicates that FGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UFO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGD | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.20% | 16.64% | -13.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.73% | 31.27% | -21.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.56% | 38.08% | -25.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 29.92% | -15.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 30.76% | -12.53% |
FGD vs. UFO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than UFO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGD vs. UFO - Dividend Comparison
FGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, more than UFO's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund | 5.09% | 5.62% | 5.87% | 6.44% | 5.74% | 5.35% | 6.17% | 5.19% | 5.88% | 4.01% | 4.36% | 5.07% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 0.29% | 0.46% | 1.98% | 1.90% | 3.19% | 1.00% | 1.07% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGD and UFO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UFO has higher volatility (16.64%) compared to FGD (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGD dropped -68.05% vs UFO's -50.33%.
On 5-year performance, UFO leads with 15.60% vs 10.37% for FGD. On fees, FGD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FGD has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UFO has performed better with a 15.60% return vs 10.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FGD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UFO.
FGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 0.29% for UFO.
FGD tracks Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index, while UFO tracks S-Network Space Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProcureAM. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FGD and 0.75% for UFO.
UFO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGD and UFO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer