PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGD vs. FYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGD vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGD achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly lower than FYLD's 18.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FGD has underperformed FYLD with an annualized return of 9.79%, while FYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.35% annualized return.


FGD

1D
-1.27%
1M
1.09%
YTD
11.09%
6M
12.57%
1Y
33.36%
3Y*
22.45%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
9.79%

FYLD

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.58%
YTD
18.51%
6M
19.88%
1Y
39.75%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
11.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGD vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund
11.09%44.42%5.71%8.20%-7.25%20.83%-5.23%20.64%-12.49%17.87%
FYLD
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
18.51%34.53%3.00%13.18%-5.53%18.67%4.17%17.83%-14.47%29.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FGD and FYLD is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2013

0.83

The correlation between FGD and FYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FGD vs. FYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGD
FYLD

Financial Services

33.6%
18.9%

Industrials

14.3%
16.1%

Energy

10.0%
32.7%

Communication Services

9.3%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
7.3%

Basic Materials

6.4%
9.4%

Utilities

4.9%
1.8%

Real Estate

2.4%

-

Technology

1.2%
4.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Financial Services

FGD
33.6%
FYLD
18.9%

Industrials

FGD
14.3%
FYLD
16.1%

Energy

FGD
10.0%
FYLD
32.7%

Communication Services

FGD
9.3%
FYLD
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

FGD
9.2%
FYLD
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FGD
8.8%
FYLD
7.3%

Basic Materials

FGD
6.4%
FYLD
9.4%

Utilities

FGD
4.9%
FYLD
1.8%

Real Estate

FGD
2.4%
FYLD

-

Technology

FGD
1.2%
FYLD
4.2%

Healthcare

FGD

-

FYLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGD vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGD
FGD Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGD Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGD Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FYLD
FYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGD vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGDFYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.62

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

7.35

-3.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.03

26.30

-14.26

FGD vs. FYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGD Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the FYLD Sharpe Ratio of 3.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGD and FYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGDFYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

3.48

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.71

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.63

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.45

-0.20

Drawdowns

FGD vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGD drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than FYLD's maximum drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGD and FYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGDFYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.05%

-44.55%

-23.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-5.44%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.50%

-15.15%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

-25.12%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.84%

-44.55%

-0.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

-1.54%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.57%

-8.83%

-3.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

1.52%

+1.26%

Volatility

FGD vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) has a higher volatility of 3.20% compared to Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) at 3.00%. This indicates that FGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGDFYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

3.00%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

8.78%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.56%

11.50%

+1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.92%

16.23%

-1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

18.03%

+0.20%

FGD vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FGD and FYLD have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Dividends

FGD vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison

FGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, more than FYLD's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund
5.09%5.62%5.87%6.44%5.74%5.35%6.17%5.19%5.88%4.01%4.36%5.07%
FYLD
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
3.65%4.07%5.41%6.06%6.13%4.74%3.94%3.73%5.17%2.85%2.72%3.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGD and FYLD have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGD has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to FYLD (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGD dropped -68.05% vs FYLD's -44.55%.

On 10-year performance, FYLD leads with 11.35% vs 9.79% for FGD. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, FYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FYLD has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 9.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FGD and FYLD have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

FGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 3.65% for FYLD.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Cambria.

FYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.48 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGD and FYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer