PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGD vs. FDVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGD vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGD achieves a 17.14% return, which is significantly higher than FDVV's 14.74% return.


FGD

1D
-0.37%
1M
6.49%
6M
8.53%
YTD
17.14%
1Y
31.46%
3Y*
23.79%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*
10.21%
ALL TIME*
6.23%

FDVV

1D
0.03%
1M
3.96%
6M
10.36%
YTD
14.74%
1Y
23.27%
3Y*
20.08%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$53.45M$50.07M$46.63M
$7.40M$5.84M$6.62M

FGD vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund
17.14%44.42%5.71%8.20%-7.25%20.83%-5.23%20.64%-12.49%17.87%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
14.74%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%29.24%2.80%24.07%-1.26%14.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FGD and FDVV is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016

0.80

The correlation between FGD and FDVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

FGD vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGD
FDVV

Financial Services

10.4%
18.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
11.0%

Industrials

4.7%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
13.4%

Communication Services

1.9%
3.4%

Basic Materials

0.9%

-

Energy

0.9%

-

Real Estate

0.9%
10.0%

Technology

0.9%
28.1%

Utilities

0.9%
9.1%

Healthcare

-

3.3%

Financial Services

FGD
10.4%
FDVV
18.5%

Consumer Defensive

FGD
4.7%
FDVV
11.0%

Industrials

FGD
4.7%
FDVV
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FGD
3.8%
FDVV
13.4%

Communication Services

FGD
1.9%
FDVV
3.4%

Basic Materials

FGD
0.9%
FDVV

-

Energy

FGD
0.9%
FDVV

-

Real Estate

FGD
0.9%
FDVV
10.0%

Technology

FGD
0.9%
FDVV
28.1%

Utilities

FGD
0.9%
FDVV
9.1%

Healthcare

FGD

-

FDVV
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGD vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGD
FGD Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGD Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGD vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGDFDVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.41

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

2.51

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.89

10.35

+0.54

FGD vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGD Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGD and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGD vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGD drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than FDVV's maximum drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGD and FDVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGDFDVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.05%

-40.25%

-27.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-9.30%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.50%

-15.90%

+4.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

-20.18%

-8.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

0.00%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.47%

-3.75%

-8.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.25%

+0.65%

Volatility

FGD vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) is 2.16%, while Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that FGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGDFDVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.16%

3.26%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

8.49%

+1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.44%

10.36%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.86%

14.69%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

16.91%

+1.00%

FGD vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGD vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

FGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than FDVV's 2.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
2.70%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%0.00%
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund
4.99%5.62%5.87%6.44%5.74%5.35%6.17%5.19%5.88%4.01%4.36%5.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGD and FDVV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDVV has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to FGD (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGD dropped -68.05% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 14.54% vs 12.41% for FGD. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FGD has been the lower-risk option at 2.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 14.54% return vs 12.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FGD.

FGD has the higher dividend yield at 4.99%, compared with 2.70% for FDVV.

FGD is categorized as Global Equities, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. FGD tracks Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FGD and 0.29% for FDVV.

FGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGD and FDVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer