FGD vs. FDVV
FGD (First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FGD is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index, while FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FGD returned 12.41%/yr vs 14.54%/yr for FDVV. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FGD charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.
Performance
FGD vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGD achieves a 17.14% return, which is significantly higher than FDVV's 14.74% return.
FGD
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- YTD
- 17.14%
- 1Y
- 31.46%
- 3Y*
- 23.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.23%
FDVV
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 3.96%
- 6M
- 10.36%
- YTD
- 14.74%
- 1Y
- 23.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.08%
- 5Y*
- 14.54%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $53.45M | $50.07M | $46.63M | |
| $7.40M | $5.84M | $6.62M |
FGD vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund | 17.14% | 44.42% | 5.71% | 8.20% | -7.25% | 20.83% | -5.23% | 20.64% | -12.49% | 17.87% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 14.74% | 17.08% | 21.81% | 18.00% | -4.21% | 29.24% | 2.80% | 24.07% | -1.26% | 14.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGD and FDVV is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016 | 0.80 |
The correlation between FGD and FDVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
FGD vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FGD
FDVV
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
Technology
Utilities
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
FGD
FDVV
Consumer Defensive
FGD
FDVV
Industrials
FGD
FDVV
Consumer Cyclical
FGD
FDVV
Communication Services
FGD
FDVV
Basic Materials
FGD
FDVV
-
Energy
FGD
FDVV
-
Real Estate
FGD
FDVV
Technology
FGD
FDVV
Utilities
FGD
FDVV
Healthcare
FGD
-
FDVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGD vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank
FGD
FDVV
FGD vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGD | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.41 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 2.51 | +0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.89 | 10.35 | +0.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGD vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGD drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than FDVV's maximum drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGD and FDVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGD | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.05% | -40.25% | -27.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | -9.30% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.50% | -15.90% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | -20.18% | -8.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | 0.00% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.47% | -3.75% | -8.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 2.25% | +0.65% |
Volatility
FGD vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) is 2.16%, while Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that FGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGD | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.16% | 3.26% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 8.49% | +1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.44% | 10.36% | +2.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.86% | 14.69% | +0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 16.91% | +1.00% |
FGD vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGD vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison
FGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than FDVV's 2.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 2.70% | 2.89% | 2.94% | 3.77% | 3.44% | 2.70% | 3.19% | 3.93% | 4.05% | 3.66% | 1.04% | 0.00% |
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund | 4.99% | 5.62% | 5.87% | 6.44% | 5.74% | 5.35% | 6.17% | 5.19% | 5.88% | 4.01% | 4.36% | 5.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGD and FDVV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDVV has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to FGD (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGD dropped -68.05% vs FDVV's -40.25%.
On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 14.54% vs 12.41% for FGD. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FGD has been the lower-risk option at 2.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 14.54% return vs 12.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FGD.
FGD has the higher dividend yield at 4.99%, compared with 2.70% for FDVV.
FGD is categorized as Global Equities, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. FGD tracks Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FGD and 0.29% for FDVV.
FGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGD and FDVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer