FGCKX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
FGCKX is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on May 15, 2008. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
FGCKX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGCKX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGCKX Fidelity Growth Company K | -2.70% | 18.67% | 37.30% | 47.35% | -33.82% | 22.62% | 67.61% | 38.50% | -4.07% | 36.89% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -3.66% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGCKX achieves a -2.70% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FGCKX has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 20.43%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 14.14% annualized return.
FGCKX
- 1D
- 4.46%
- 1M
- -4.64%
- YTD
- -2.70%
- 6M
- -3.14%
- 1Y
- 31.27%
- 3Y*
- 26.04%
- 5Y*
- 12.71%
- 10Y*
- 20.43%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- -3.66%
- 6M
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGCKX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGCKX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGCKX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
FGCKX
VOO
FGCKX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGCKX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 1.01 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | 1.53 | +0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.23 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 1.55 | +0.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.49 | 7.31 | +0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGCKX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 1.01 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.71 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.79 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.83 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGCKX and VOO is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGCKX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
FGCKX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGCKX Fidelity Growth Company K | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.80% | 3.81% | 7.16% | 10.63% | 8.83% | 3.84% | 6.38% | 4.73% | 6.20% | 3.96% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.18% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
FGCKX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGCKX drawdown since its inception was -51.01%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGCKX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGCKX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.01% | -33.99% | -17.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.09% | -11.98% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.21% | -24.52% | -15.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.21% | -33.99% | -6.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.65% | -5.55% | -3.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.03% | -3.72% | -5.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.72% | 2.55% | +1.17% |
Volatility
FGCKX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX) has a higher volatility of 8.22% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.34%. This indicates that FGCKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGCKX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.22% | 5.34% | +2.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.30% | 9.47% | +5.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.67% | 18.11% | +6.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.06% | 16.82% | +7.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.37% | 17.99% | +5.38% |