FGCKX vs. IWB
FGCKX (Fidelity Growth Company K) and IWB (iShares Russell 1000 ETF) are both funds - FGCKX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while IWB is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Index. FGCKX is actively managed, while IWB is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FGCKX returned 22.78%/yr vs 15.13%/yr for IWB. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FGCKX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IWB.
Performance
FGCKX vs. IWB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGCKX achieves a 18.41% return, which is significantly higher than IWB's 8.87% return. Over the past 10 years, FGCKX has outperformed IWB with an annualized return of 22.78%, while IWB has yielded a comparatively lower 15.13% annualized return.
FGCKX
- 1D
- 2.46%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- YTD
- 18.41%
- 6M
- 14.46%
- 1Y
- 40.30%
- 3Y*
- 29.35%
- 5Y*
- 15.68%
- 10Y*
- 22.78%
IWB
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 8.87%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 23.60%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.13%
FGCKX vs. IWB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGCKX Fidelity Growth Company K | 18.41% | 18.67% | 37.30% | 47.35% | -33.82% | 22.62% | 67.61% | 38.50% | -4.07% | 36.89% |
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 8.87% | 17.18% | 24.32% | 26.39% | -19.19% | 26.32% | 20.77% | 31.06% | -4.90% | 21.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGCKX and IWB is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2008 | 0.90 |
The correlation between FGCKX and IWB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGCKX vs. IWB — Risk / Return Rank
FGCKX
IWB
FGCKX vs. IWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGCKX | IWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.35 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 2.67 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.10 | 11.98 | +0.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGCKX vs. IWB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGCKX drawdown since its inception was -51.01%, smaller than the maximum IWB drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGCKX and IWB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGCKX | IWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.01% | -55.38% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.55% | -8.86% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.20% | -19.09% | -7.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.21% | -25.20% | -15.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.21% | -34.60% | -5.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.34% | -2.21% | -2.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.95% | -10.85% | +1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 1.98% | +1.41% |
Volatility
FGCKX vs. IWB - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) at 4.37%. This indicates that FGCKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGCKX | IWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | 4.37% | +2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.39% | 9.64% | +5.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.19% | 12.39% | +6.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.13% | 17.17% | +6.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.48% | 18.16% | +5.32% |
FGCKX vs. IWB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGCKX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IWB's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGCKX vs. IWB - Dividend Comparison
FGCKX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGCKX Fidelity Growth Company K | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.80% | 3.81% | 7.16% | 10.63% | 8.83% | 3.84% | 6.38% | 4.73% | 6.20% | 3.96% |
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.14% | 1.31% | 1.56% | 1.09% | 1.37% | 1.71% | 2.06% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGCKX and IWB have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FGCKX has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to IWB (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGCKX dropped -51.01% vs IWB's -55.38%.
FGCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGCKX and IWB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer