FG vs. INGR
FG (F&G Annuities & Life Inc. ) and INGR (Ingredion Incorporated) are both stocks. FG operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services), while INGR operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 3 years, FG returned 11.36%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for INGR. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FG vs. INGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FG achieves a -9.91% return, which is significantly lower than INGR's -6.92% return.
FG
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -3.88%
- YTD
- -9.91%
- 6M
- -13.59%
- 1Y
- -12.18%
- 3Y*
- 11.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INGR
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -8.43%
- YTD
- -6.92%
- 6M
- -4.69%
- 1Y
- -25.20%
- 3Y*
- 0.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.78%
- 10Y*
- 0.94%
FG vs. INGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FG F&G Annuities & Life Inc. | -9.91% | -23.60% | -7.98% | 137.11% | 4.60% |
INGR Ingredion Incorporated | -6.92% | -17.86% | 29.22% | 14.08% | 0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FG and INGR is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2022 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
FG:
$3.85
INGR:
$13.96
FG:
7.14
INGR:
7.24
FG:
0.13
INGR:
0.08
FG:
0.65
INGR:
0.91
FG:
$5.86B
INGR:
$5.41B
FG:
$1.23B
INGR:
$1.36B
FG:
$1.52B
INGR:
$902.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FG vs. INGR — Risk / Return Rank
FG
INGR
FG vs. INGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F&G Annuities & Life Inc. (FG) and Ingredion Incorporated (INGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FG | INGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | -1.54 | +1.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | -2.10 | +1.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.75 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | -0.97 | +0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | -1.65 | +0.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FG | INGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 | -1.54 | +1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.29 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
FG vs. INGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FG drawdown since its inception was -56.24%, smaller than the maximum INGR drawdown of -64.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FG and INGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FG | INGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.24% | -64.20% | +7.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.92% | -26.04% | -14.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.24% | -32.62% | -23.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.22% | -32.09% | -9.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.26% | -18.31% | -0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.15% | 15.37% | +1.78% |
Volatility
FG vs. INGR - Volatility Comparison
F&G Annuities & Life Inc. (FG) has a higher volatility of 11.85% compared to Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) at 5.92%. This indicates that FG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FG | INGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.85% | 5.92% | +5.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.48% | 11.73% | +18.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.82% | 16.40% | +19.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.38% | 21.28% | +22.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.38% | 24.88% | +18.50% |
Dividends
FG vs. INGR - Dividend Comparison
FG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than INGR's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FG F&G Annuities & Life Inc. | 3.42% | 2.95% | 2.05% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INGR Ingredion Incorporated | 3.22% | 2.92% | 1.72% | 2.75% | 2.78% | 2.67% | 3.23% | 2.70% | 2.68% | 1.57% | 1.52% | 1.82% |
Financials
FG vs. INGR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between F&G Annuities & Life Inc. and Ingredion Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FG and INGR have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FG has higher volatility (11.85%) compared to INGR (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FG dropped -56.24% vs INGR's -64.20%.
FG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.34 vs -1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FG and INGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer