PortfoliosLab logo
FG vs. SMID
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FG and SMID is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FG vs. SMID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F&G Annuities & Life Inc. (FG) and Smith-Midland Corporation (SMID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FG:

-0.48

SMID:

-0.21

Sortino Ratio

FG:

-0.44

SMID:

-0.05

Omega Ratio

FG:

0.94

SMID:

0.99

Calmar Ratio

FG:

-0.63

SMID:

-0.49

Martin Ratio

FG:

-1.57

SMID:

-1.05

Ulcer Index

FG:

15.05%

SMID:

22.80%

Daily Std Dev

FG:

46.93%

SMID:

71.53%

Max Drawdown

FG:

-37.50%

SMID:

-94.34%

Current Drawdown

FG:

-34.29%

SMID:

-41.42%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FG:

$4.31B

SMID:

$162.00M

EPS

FG:

$3.80

SMID:

$1.22

PE Ratio

FG:

8.42

SMID:

25.03

PS Ratio

FG:

0.84

SMID:

2.12

PB Ratio

FG:

0.99

SMID:

4.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

FG:

$4.15B

SMID:

$43.22M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FG:

$3.16B

SMID:

$11.71M

EBITDA (TTM)

FG:

$846.00M

SMID:

$7.93M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FG achieves a -23.06% return, which is significantly higher than SMID's -34.08% return.


FG

YTD

-23.06%

1M

-6.90%

6M

-31.97%

1Y

-22.45%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SMID

YTD

-34.08%

1M

-3.17%

6M

-35.58%

1Y

-15.02%

3Y*

27.23%

5Y*

44.14%

10Y*

29.76%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


F&G Annuities & Life Inc.

Smith-Midland Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FG vs. SMID — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FG is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FG is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FG is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FG is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FG is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FG is 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SMID
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SMID is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SMID is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SMID is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SMID is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SMID is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SMID is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FG vs. SMID - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F&G Annuities & Life Inc. (FG) and Smith-Midland Corporation (SMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FG Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the SMID Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FG and SMID, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FG vs. SMID - Dividend Comparison

FG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, while SMID has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FG
F&G Annuities & Life Inc.
2.71%2.05%1.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMID
Smith-Midland Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.92%0.74%0.73%0.19%1.23%1.59%

Drawdowns

FG vs. SMID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FG drawdown since its inception was -37.50%, smaller than the maximum SMID drawdown of -94.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FG and SMID.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FG vs. SMID - Volatility Comparison

F&G Annuities & Life Inc. (FG) has a higher volatility of 17.74% compared to Smith-Midland Corporation (SMID) at 16.16%. This indicates that FG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FG vs. SMID - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between F&G Annuities & Life Inc. and Smith-Midland Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20212022202320242025
908.00M
23.58M
(FG) Total Revenue
(SMID) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items