FG vs. SMID
Compare and contrast key facts about F&G Annuities & Life Inc. (FG) and Smith-Midland Corporation (SMID).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FG or SMID.
Key characteristics
FG | SMID | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 0.47% | -13.67% |
1Y Return | 14.32% | 34.30% |
Sharpe Ratio | 0.41 | 0.55 |
Sortino Ratio | 0.88 | 1.16 |
Omega Ratio | 1.11 | 1.15 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.69 | 0.80 |
Martin Ratio | 1.34 | 1.60 |
Ulcer Index | 13.21% | 23.54% |
Daily Std Dev | 42.79% | 68.29% |
Max Drawdown | -37.32% | -94.34% |
Current Drawdown | -4.11% | -28.41% |
Fundamentals
FG | SMID | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $5.83B | $198.17M |
EPS | -$0.02 | $0.87 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | $4.38B | $52.78M |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $4.24B | $12.17M |
EBITDA (TTM) | $264.00M | $5.48M |
Correlation
The correlation between FG and SMID is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FG vs. SMID - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FG achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly higher than SMID's -13.67% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FG vs. SMID - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F&G Annuities & Life Inc. (FG) and Smith-Midland Corporation (SMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FG vs. SMID - Dividend Comparison
FG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, while SMID has not paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F&G Annuities & Life Inc. | 1.85% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Smith-Midland Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 0.74% | 0.73% | 0.19% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
FG vs. SMID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FG drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, smaller than the maximum SMID drawdown of -94.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FG and SMID. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FG vs. SMID - Volatility Comparison
F&G Annuities & Life Inc. (FG) has a higher volatility of 18.04% compared to Smith-Midland Corporation (SMID) at 13.15%. This indicates that FG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FG vs. SMID - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between F&G Annuities & Life Inc. and Smith-Midland Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities