PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFXSX vs. RFBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFXSX vs. RFBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Limited Term Government Fund (FFXSX) and Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFXSX achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly lower than RFBAX's 0.88% return. Over the past 10 years, FFXSX has outperformed RFBAX with an annualized return of 1.20%, while RFBAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.06% annualized return.


FFXSX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.19%
YTD
0.02%
6M
0.30%
1Y
2.77%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
0.98%
10Y*
1.20%

RFBAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.88%
6M
1.15%
1Y
3.08%
3Y*
3.97%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
1.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFXSX vs. RFBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFXSX
Fidelity Limited Term Government Fund
0.02%5.65%2.61%4.13%-6.37%-1.54%3.86%3.77%1.16%0.56%
RFBAX
Davis Government Bond Fund
0.88%4.49%4.33%3.63%-5.29%-1.48%1.69%3.23%0.42%0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FFXSX and RFBAX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1995

0.64

The correlation between FFXSX and RFBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFXSX vs. RFBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFXSX
FFXSX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FFXSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFXSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFXSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FFXSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFXSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

RFBAX
RFBAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
RFBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RFBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFXSX vs. RFBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Limited Term Government Fund (FFXSX) and Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFXSXRFBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.48

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

4.27

-2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.01

16.71

-10.70

FFXSX vs. RFBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFXSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the RFBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFXSX and RFBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFXSX vs. RFBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFXSX drawdown since its inception was -9.78%, which is greater than RFBAX's maximum drawdown of -8.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFXSX and RFBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFXSXRFBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.78%

-8.03%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.43%

-0.77%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.62%

-0.88%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.20%

-7.50%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.78%

-8.03%

-1.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-0.19%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-1.18%

+0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

0.20%

+0.28%

Volatility

FFXSX vs. RFBAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Limited Term Government Fund (FFXSX) has a higher volatility of 0.83% compared to Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX) at 0.55%. This indicates that FFXSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFXSXRFBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

0.55%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.60%

1.30%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12%

1.87%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.06%

2.10%

+0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.44%

1.78%

+0.66%

FFXSX vs. RFBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFXSX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than RFBAX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFXSX vs. RFBAX - Dividend Comparison

FFXSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than RFBAX's 3.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFXSX
Fidelity Limited Term Government Fund
3.38%3.30%2.47%2.21%0.72%0.42%1.23%1.88%1.35%1.18%1.20%0.85%
RFBAX
Davis Government Bond Fund
3.04%3.01%3.23%2.15%0.80%0.57%0.93%1.67%1.17%0.59%0.68%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFXSX and RFBAX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFXSX has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to RFBAX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFXSX dropped -9.78% vs RFBAX's -8.03%.

RFBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFXSX and RFBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer