FFXSX vs. FIWGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FFXSX (Fidelity Limited Term Government Fund) and FIWGX (Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund) are both mutual funds - FFXSX is a Government Bonds fund managed by Fidelity, while FIWGX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FFXSX returned 0.98%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FIWGX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFXSX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for FIWGX.

Performance

FFXSX vs. FIWGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Limited Term Government Fund (FFXSX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFXSX achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly higher than FIWGX's -0.05% return.

FFXSX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -0.02%
• YTD: 0.22%
• 6M: 0.50%
• 1Y: 3.20%
• 3Y*: 3.74%
• 5Y*: 0.98%
• 10Y*: 1.26%

FIWGX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: -0.05%
• 6M: 0.06%
• 1Y: 4.16%
• 3Y*: 4.28%
• 5Y*: 0.30%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFXSX vs. FIWGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FFXSX Fidelity Limited Term Government Fund	0.22%	5.65%	2.61%	4.13%	-6.37%	-1.54%	3.86%	3.77%	1.52%
FIWGX Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund	-0.05%	6.90%	2.14%	6.51%	-13.71%	-0.37%	10.21%	9.39%	1.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FFXSX and FIWGX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2018	0.79

The correlation between FFXSX and FIWGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FFXSX vs. FIWGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFXSX

FFXSX Risk / Return Rank: 39
FFXSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FFXSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
FFXSX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
FFXSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FFXSX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

FIWGX

FIWGX Risk / Return Rank: 26
FIWGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
FIWGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FIWGX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
FIWGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
FIWGX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFXSX vs. FIWGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Limited Term Government Fund (FFXSX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFXSX	FIWGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	1.36	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	2.05	+0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.24	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	2.23	+0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.67	6.60	+1.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFXSX vs. FIWGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFXSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the FIWGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFXSX and FIWGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFXSX	FIWGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.65	1.36	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.05	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.56	0.49	+1.06

Drawdowns

FFXSX vs. FIWGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFXSX drawdown since its inception was -9.78%, smaller than the maximum FIWGX drawdown of -18.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFXSX and FIWGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFXSX	FIWGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.78%	-18.42%	+8.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.43%	-2.52%	+1.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.62%	-6.24%	+4.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.20%	-18.42%	+9.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-9.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-1.22%	+0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	-5.03%	+4.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.45%	1.12%	-0.67%

Volatility

FFXSX vs. FIWGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Limited Term Government Fund (FFXSX) is 0.67%, while Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) has a volatility of 1.50%. This indicates that FFXSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIWGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFXSX	FIWGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.67%	1.50%	-0.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.48%	2.83%	-1.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.08%	4.14%	-2.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.04%	6.10%	-3.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.44%	5.51%	-3.07%

FFXSX vs. FIWGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFXSX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FIWGX's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFXSX vs. FIWGX - Dividend Comparison

FFXSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, less than FIWGX's 3.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFXSX Fidelity Limited Term Government Fund	3.37%	3.30%	2.47%	2.21%	0.72%	0.42%	1.23%	1.88%	1.35%	1.18%	1.20%	0.85%
FIWGX Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund	3.44%	3.68%	4.36%	3.79%	2.24%	1.77%	6.83%	4.30%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFXSX and FIWGX in my portfolio?

FFXSX and FIWGX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFXSX or FIWGX?

FIWGX has higher volatility (1.50%) compared to FFXSX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFXSX dropped -9.78% vs FIWGX's -18.42%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFXSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.