PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FFTY vs. MDYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FFTY vs. MDYG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

FFTY (CapForce IBD 50 ETF) and MDYG (SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - FFTY tracks the IBD 50 Index while MDYG tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FFTY returned 5.57%/yr vs 10.93%/yr for MDYG. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FFTY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MDYG.

Performance

FFTY vs. MDYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFTY achieves a 6.26% return, which is significantly lower than MDYG's 15.86% return. Over the past 10 years, FFTY has underperformed MDYG with an annualized return of 5.57%, while MDYG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.93% annualized return.

FFTY

1D
-0.91%
1M
-9.03%
6M
3.47%
YTD
6.26%
1Y
13.28%
3Y*
13.48%
5Y*
-2.78%
10Y*
5.57%
ALL TIME*
4.04%

MDYG

1D
-0.08%
1M
-2.79%
6M
11.45%
YTD
15.86%
1Y
22.86%
3Y*
13.90%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
10.93%
ALL TIME*
10.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

FFTY

CapForce IBD 50 ETF
$863.41K$1.19M$1.59M

MDYG

SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF
$9.81M$8.69M$9.37M

FFTY vs. MDYG - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFTY
CapForce IBD 50 ETF		6.26%23.38%18.36%12.40%-51.08%11.92%18.20%25.74%-16.76%37.62%
MDYG
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF		15.86%7.22%15.84%17.30%-18.92%18.46%22.57%26.10%-10.46%19.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FFTY and MDYG is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2015

0.77

The correlation between FFTY and MDYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

FFTY vs. MDYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FFTY
MDYG

Healthcare

43.7%
13.6%

Financial Services

20.9%
6.7%

Technology

18.5%
23.9%

Industrials

5.7%
30.6%

Basic Materials

3.6%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

3.6%
7.3%

Energy

2.6%
3.0%

Utilities

2.1%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
1.6%

Communication Services

0.9%
2.2%

Real Estate

0.5%
5.2%

Healthcare

FFTY
43.7%
MDYG
13.6%

Financial Services

FFTY
20.9%
MDYG
6.7%

Technology

FFTY
18.5%
MDYG
23.9%

Industrials

FFTY
5.7%
MDYG
30.6%

Basic Materials

FFTY
3.6%
MDYG
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FFTY
3.6%
MDYG
7.3%

Energy

FFTY
2.6%
MDYG
3.0%

Utilities

FFTY
2.1%
MDYG
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

FFTY
1.0%
MDYG
1.6%

Communication Services

FFTY
0.9%
MDYG
2.2%

Real Estate

FFTY
0.5%
MDYG
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CapForce IBD 50 ETF

SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF

Often compared with FFTY:
FFTY vs. SPYFFTY vs. QQQFFTY vs. BOUTFFTY vs. BFORFFTY vs. VOOFFTY vs. LOUPFFTY vs. IGV
Often compared with MDYG:
MDYG vs. IMCGMDYG vs. IVOVMDYG vs. SPYGMDYG vs. VOMDYG vs. VOTMDYG vs. XMVMMDYG vs. SCHD

Return for Risk

FFTY vs. MDYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
FFTY
FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
MDYG
MDYG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
MDYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDYG Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
MDYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDYG Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFTY vs. MDYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FFTYMDYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.26
1.19

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.59
1.78

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.21

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

2.14

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.00

7.90

-6.90

FFTY vs. MDYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the MDYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFTY and MDYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFTY vs. MDYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFTY drawdown since its inception was -59.46%, roughly equal to the maximum MDYG drawdown of -58.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFTY and MDYG.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FFTYMDYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.46%

-58.44%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.29%

-9.91%

-13.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.60%

-25.45%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.46%

-29.26%

-30.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.46%

-39.27%

-20.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.10%

-4.72%

-20.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.32%

-7.98%

-14.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.51%

2.68%

+6.83%

Volatility

FFTY vs. MDYG - Volatility Comparison

CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) at 4.53%. This indicates that FFTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FFTYMDYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.45%

4.53%

+3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.16%

14.11%

+15.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.53%

17.88%

+18.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.75%

20.72%

+9.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.79%

21.08%

+6.71%

FFTY vs. MDYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFTY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than MDYG's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFTY vs. MDYG - Dividend Comparison

FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than MDYG's 0.59% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFTY
CapForce IBD 50 ETF		1.27%1.35%0.91%0.65%2.75%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%0.00%0.00%
MDYG
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF		0.59%0.75%0.87%1.20%1.16%0.69%0.71%1.21%1.36%2.23%1.25%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

FFTY and MDYG have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFTY has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to MDYG (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFTY dropped -59.46% vs MDYG's -58.44%.

On 10-year performance, MDYG leads with 10.93% vs 5.57% for FFTY. On fees, MDYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MDYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MDYG has performed better with a 10.93% return vs 5.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MDYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.

FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.59% for MDYG.

FFTY tracks IBD 50 Index, while MDYG tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: CapForce and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FFTY and 0.15% for MDYG.

MDYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFTY and MDYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer