FFTY vs. IMCG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FFTY (CapForce IBD 50 ETF) and IMCG (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - FFTY tracks the IBD 50 Index while IMCG tracks the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FFTY returned 5.57%/yr vs 14.11%/yr for IMCG. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FFTY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IMCG.

Performance

FFTY vs. IMCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFTY achieves a 6.26% return, which is significantly lower than IMCG's 19.44% return. Over the past 10 years, FFTY has underperformed IMCG with an annualized return of 5.57%, while IMCG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.11% annualized return.

FFTY

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: -9.03%
• 6M: 3.47%
• YTD: 6.26%
• 1Y: 13.28%
• 3Y*: 13.48%
• 5Y*: -2.78%
• 10Y*: 5.57%
• ALL TIME*: 4.04%

IMCG

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -2.22%
• 6M: 16.42%
• YTD: 19.44%
• 1Y: 19.29%
• 3Y*: 15.82%
• 5Y*: 7.06%
• 10Y*: 14.11%
• ALL TIME*: 11.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF	$863.41K	$1.19M	$1.59M
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF	$8.72M	$8.89M	$9.03M

FFTY vs. IMCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF	6.26%	23.38%	18.36%	12.40%	-51.08%	11.92%	18.20%	25.74%	-16.76%	37.62%
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF	19.44%	6.55%	18.14%	20.73%	-25.79%	15.39%	45.64%	35.70%	-3.68%	25.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FFTY and IMCG is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2015	0.82

The correlation between FFTY and IMCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

FFTY vs. IMCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FFTY	IMCG
Healthcare	43.7%	7.2%
Financial Services	20.9%	11.7%
Technology	18.5%	25.1%
Industrials	5.7%	24.5%
Basic Materials	3.6%	6.8%
Consumer Cyclical	3.6%	9.8%
Energy	2.6%	3.2%
Utilities	2.1%	3.3%
Consumer Defensive	1.0%	2.0%
Communication Services	0.9%	2.2%
Real Estate	0.5%	3.9%

Return for Risk

FFTY vs. IMCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFTY

FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 18
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 18

IMCG

IMCG Risk / Return Rank: 45
IMCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
IMCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
IMCG Omega Ratio Rank: 39
IMCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
IMCG Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFTY vs. IMCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFTY	IMCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.26	1.02	-0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.59	1.53	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.18	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.41	1.70	-1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.00	6.41	-5.41

FFTY vs. IMCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the IMCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFTY and IMCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFTY vs. IMCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFTY drawdown since its inception was -59.46%, roughly equal to the maximum IMCG drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFTY and IMCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFTY	IMCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.46%	-58.96%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.29%	-10.17%	-13.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.60%	-21.92%	-7.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.46%	-35.08%	-24.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.46%	-35.08%	-24.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.10%	-3.25%	-21.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.32%	-9.17%	-13.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.51%	2.70%	+6.81%

Volatility

FFTY vs. IMCG - Volatility Comparison

CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) at 3.48%. This indicates that FFTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFTY	IMCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.45%	3.48%	+4.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.16%	14.04%	+15.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.53%	16.92%	+19.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.75%	20.36%	+9.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.79%	20.55%	+7.24%

FFTY vs. IMCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFTY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCG's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFTY vs. IMCG - Dividend Comparison

FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than IMCG's 0.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF	1.27%	1.35%	0.91%	0.65%	2.75%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.63%	0.78%	0.78%	0.85%	0.91%	0.41%	0.09%	0.30%	0.35%	0.45%	0.52%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFTY and IMCG in my portfolio?

FFTY and IMCG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFTY or IMCG?

FFTY has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to IMCG (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFTY dropped -59.46% vs IMCG's -58.96%.

Which ETF is better, FFTY or IMCG?

On 10-year performance, IMCG leads with 14.11% vs 5.57% for FFTY. On fees, IMCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCG has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FFTY or IMCG?

Over the 10-year period, IMCG has performed better with a 14.11% return vs 5.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFTY or IMCG?

IMCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFTY or IMCG?

FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.63% for IMCG.

What is the main difference between FFTY and IMCG?

FFTY tracks IBD 50 Index, while IMCG tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: CapForce and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FFTY and 0.06% for IMCG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IMCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.