PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFTY vs. GRNJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFTY vs. GRNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFTY achieves a 20.11% return, which is significantly lower than GRNJ's 26.11% return.


FFTY

1D
-0.14%
1M
7.67%
YTD
20.11%
6M
21.02%
1Y
38.14%
3Y*
21.57%
5Y*
-0.60%
10Y*
7.57%

GRNJ

1D
-1.17%
1M
8.92%
YTD
26.11%
6M
25.03%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFTY vs. GRNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FFTY
Innovator IBD 50 ETF
20.11%4.30%
GRNJ
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF
26.11%5.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FFTY and GRNJ is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.82

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFTY vs. GRNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFTY
FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

GRNJ
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFTY vs. GRNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFTYGRNJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.36

FFTY vs. GRNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFTYGRNJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

2.35

-2.15

Drawdowns

FFTY vs. GRNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFTY drawdown since its inception was -59.46%, which is greater than GRNJ's maximum drawdown of -17.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFTY and GRNJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFTYGRNJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.46%

-17.32%

-42.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.34%

-1.17%

-14.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.38%

-4.13%

-18.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.77%

Volatility

FFTY vs. GRNJ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFTYGRNJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.09%

29.93%

+4.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.14%

29.93%

-0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.41%

29.93%

-2.52%

FFTY vs. GRNJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFTY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than GRNJ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFTY vs. GRNJ - Dividend Comparison

FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFTY
Innovator IBD 50 ETF
1.12%1.35%0.91%0.65%2.75%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%
GRNJ
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFTY and GRNJ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GRNJ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GRNJ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.

FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.

FFTY is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GRNJ is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Fundstrat. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FFTY and 0.75% for GRNJ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFTY and GRNJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer