FFTY vs. GRNJ
FFTY (Innovator IBD 50 ETF) and GRNJ (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFTY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index, while GRNJ is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fundstrat. FFTY is passively managed, while GRNJ is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FFTY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRNJ.
Performance
FFTY vs. GRNJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFTY achieves a 20.11% return, which is significantly lower than GRNJ's 26.11% return.
FFTY
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 7.67%
- YTD
- 20.11%
- 6M
- 21.02%
- 1Y
- 38.14%
- 3Y*
- 21.57%
- 5Y*
- -0.60%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
GRNJ
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 8.92%
- YTD
- 26.11%
- 6M
- 25.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FFTY vs. GRNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 20.11% | 4.30% |
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 26.11% | 5.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFTY and GRNJ is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFTY vs. GRNJ — Risk / Return Rank
FFTY
GRNJ
FFTY vs. GRNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFTY | GRNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.36 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFTY | GRNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 2.35 | -2.15 |
Drawdowns
FFTY vs. GRNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFTY drawdown since its inception was -59.46%, which is greater than GRNJ's maximum drawdown of -17.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFTY and GRNJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFTY | GRNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.46% | -17.32% | -42.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.34% | -1.17% | -14.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.38% | -4.13% | -18.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.77% | — | — |
Volatility
FFTY vs. GRNJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFTY | GRNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.42% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.18% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.09% | 29.93% | +4.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.14% | 29.93% | -0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.41% | 29.93% | -2.52% |
FFTY vs. GRNJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFTY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than GRNJ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFTY vs. GRNJ - Dividend Comparison
FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 1.12% | 1.35% | 0.91% | 0.65% | 2.75% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% |
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFTY and GRNJ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GRNJ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GRNJ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.
FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.
FFTY is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GRNJ is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Fundstrat. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FFTY and 0.75% for GRNJ.
Find the right allocation for FFTY and GRNJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer