PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFTHX vs. RPFGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFTHX vs. RPFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund (FFTHX) and Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFTHX achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly higher than RPFGX's -6.26% return. Over the past 10 years, FFTHX has underperformed RPFGX with an annualized return of 10.69%, while RPFGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.97% annualized return.


FFTHX

1D
0.48%
1M
3.80%
YTD
10.11%
6M
11.29%
1Y
23.66%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
10.69%

RPFGX

1D
1.02%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
-6.26%
6M
-2.13%
1Y
11.41%
3Y*
22.72%
5Y*
10.48%
10Y*
11.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFTHX vs. RPFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFTHX
Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund
10.11%19.16%11.03%17.67%-17.67%14.44%17.14%24.49%-8.40%20.73%
RPFGX
Davis Financial Fund
-6.26%29.28%29.54%15.60%-8.91%31.45%-5.87%26.51%-11.74%19.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FFTHX and RPFGX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2003

0.79

The correlation between FFTHX and RPFGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFTHX vs. RPFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFTHX
FFTHX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FFTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FFTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

RPFGX
RPFGX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
RPFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
RPFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFTHX vs. RPFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund (FFTHX) and Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFTHXRPFGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.15

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

0.82

+2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.93

2.25

+11.68

FFTHX vs. RPFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFTHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the RPFGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFTHX and RPFGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFTHXRPFGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

0.80

+1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.55

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.54

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.57

-0.07

Drawdowns

FFTHX vs. RPFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFTHX drawdown since its inception was -52.86%, smaller than the maximum RPFGX drawdown of -67.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFTHX and RPFGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFTHXRPFGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.86%

-67.11%

+14.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.52%

-14.54%

+7.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.60%

-16.30%

+4.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.94%

-26.86%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.81%

-45.24%

+16.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-9.18%

+9.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.95%

-9.86%

+2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

5.29%

-3.57%

Volatility

FFTHX vs. RPFGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund (FFTHX) is 3.40%, while Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that FFTHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFTHXRPFGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

3.95%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.99%

11.52%

-3.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.68%

14.85%

-5.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.40%

19.30%

-6.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.52%

22.31%

-8.79%

FFTHX vs. RPFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFTHX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than RPFGX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFTHX vs. RPFGX - Dividend Comparison

FFTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, more than RPFGX's 4.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFTHX
Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund
5.85%5.03%2.75%1.86%11.21%11.62%5.93%6.75%7.66%3.17%4.00%5.97%
RPFGX
Davis Financial Fund
4.24%3.98%4.19%6.96%3.41%6.60%5.60%7.96%8.93%2.32%1.68%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFTHX and RPFGX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RPFGX has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to FFTHX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFTHX dropped -52.86% vs RPFGX's -67.11%.

FFTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFTHX and RPFGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer