PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFSZX vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FFSZX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFSZX achieves a 12.78% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 11.03% return.


FFSZX

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.63%
6M
8.05%
YTD
12.78%
1Y
25.55%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.09%

^GSPC

1D
1.48%
1M
1.57%
6M
8.95%
YTD
11.03%
1Y
21.84%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
13.29%
ALL TIME*
8.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$38.00T$37.50T$41.55T
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FFSZX vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FFSZX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6
12.78%24.08%14.41%20.78%-18.05%16.81%18.36%9.18%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
11.03%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%10.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FFSZX and ^GSPC is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.92

The correlation between FFSZX and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFSZX vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFSZX
FFSZX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FFSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFSZX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFSZX^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.31

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.41

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.40

10.22

+0.18

FFSZX vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFSZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFSZX and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFSZX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFSZX drawdown since its inception was -31.00%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFSZX and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFSZX^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.00%

-56.78%

+25.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.77%

-9.10%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-18.90%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.17%

-25.43%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.99%

-0.12%

-1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-10.70%

+4.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.14%

+0.19%

Volatility

FFSZX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.80%. This indicates that FFSZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFSZX^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

3.80%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.45%

10.20%

+2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.42%

12.86%

+1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.27%

17.02%

-1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.08%

18.08%

-1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FFSZX and ^GSPC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFSZX has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to ^GSPC (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFSZX dropped -31.00% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFSZX and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer