FFRHX vs. SRLN
FFRHX (Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund) and SRLN (State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF) are both Bank Loan funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, FFRHX returned 4.90%/yr vs 4.52%/yr for SRLN. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FFRHX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for SRLN.
Performance
FFRHX vs. SRLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFRHX achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly higher than SRLN's 0.50% return. Over the past 10 years, FFRHX has outperformed SRLN with an annualized return of 4.90%, while SRLN has yielded a comparatively lower 4.52% annualized return.
FFRHX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 5.89%
- 3Y*
- 7.24%
- 5Y*
- 5.35%
- 10Y*
- 4.90%
SRLN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- 1Y
- 5.31%
- 3Y*
- 7.44%
- 5Y*
- 4.52%
- 10Y*
- 4.52%
FFRHX vs. SRLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund | 1.60% | 5.47% | 7.10% | 12.63% | -1.55% | 5.01% | 1.69% | 8.63% | 0.10% | 3.91% |
SRLN State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF | 0.50% | 6.77% | 8.43% | 11.62% | -5.30% | 4.49% | 3.13% | 10.03% | -0.66% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFRHX and SRLN is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2013 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFRHX vs. SRLN — Risk / Return Rank
FFRHX
SRLN
FFRHX vs. SRLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) and State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FFRHX | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.86 | 1.41 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.87 | 1.60 | +3.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.02 | 5.93 | +11.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FFRHX vs. SRLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFRHX drawdown since its inception was -22.20%, roughly equal to the maximum SRLN drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFRHX and SRLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFRHX | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.20% | -22.29% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.19% | -3.26% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.29% | -4.26% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.90% | -7.93% | +2.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.20% | -22.29% | +0.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.30% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.15% | -1.10% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.34% | 0.88% | -0.54% |
Volatility
FFRHX vs. SRLN - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) has a higher volatility of 0.64% compared to State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) at 0.53%. This indicates that FFRHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFRHX | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.64% | 0.53% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.63% | 2.65% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37% | 2.90% | -0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.88% | 3.91% | -1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 6.06% | -1.92% |
FFRHX vs. SRLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFRHX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than SRLN's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFRHX vs. SRLN - Dividend Comparison
FFRHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.10%, less than SRLN's 7.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund | 7.10% | 7.41% | 6.94% | 8.24% | 3.81% | 2.74% | 3.84% | 5.15% | 4.74% | 4.05% | 4.44% | 3.69% |
SRLN State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF | 7.51% | 7.67% | 8.58% | 8.44% | 5.72% | 4.45% | 4.91% | 5.39% | 4.98% | 4.01% | 3.94% | 4.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFRHX and SRLN have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFRHX has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to SRLN (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFRHX dropped -22.20% vs SRLN's -22.29%.
FFRHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFRHX and SRLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer