FFRHX vs. BIL
FFRHX (Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund) and BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both funds - FFRHX is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Fidelity, while BIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. FFRHX is actively managed, while BIL is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FFRHX returned 4.90%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for BIL. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. FFRHX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BIL.
Performance
FFRHX vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with FFRHX at 1.60% and BIL at 1.60%. Over the past 10 years, FFRHX has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 4.90%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.20% annualized return.
FFRHX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 5.89%
- 3Y*
- 7.24%
- 5Y*
- 5.35%
- 10Y*
- 4.90%
BIL
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.85%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- 2.20%
FFRHX vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund | 1.60% | 5.47% | 7.10% | 12.63% | -1.55% | 5.01% | 1.69% | 8.63% | 0.10% | 3.91% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.60% | 4.15% | 5.19% | 4.94% | 1.40% | -0.10% | 0.40% | 2.03% | 1.74% | 0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFRHX and BIL is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2007 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFRHX vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
FFRHX
BIL
FFRHX vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FFRHX | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -17.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -169.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.86 | 88.41 | -86.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.87 | 357.44 | -352.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.02 | 2,834.34 | -2,817.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FFRHX vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFRHX drawdown since its inception was -22.20%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFRHX and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFRHX | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.20% | -0.78% | -21.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.19% | -0.01% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.29% | -0.01% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.90% | -0.09% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.20% | -0.21% | -21.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | 0.00% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.15% | -0.26% | -0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.34% | 0.00% | +0.34% |
Volatility
FFRHX vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) has a higher volatility of 0.64% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.06%. This indicates that FFRHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFRHX | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.64% | 0.06% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.63% | 0.14% | +1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37% | 0.20% | +2.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.88% | 0.26% | +2.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 0.26% | +3.88% |
FFRHX vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFRHX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFRHX vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
FFRHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.10%, more than BIL's 3.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.86% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% | 0.00% |
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund | 7.10% | 7.41% | 6.94% | 8.24% | 3.81% | 2.74% | 3.84% | 5.15% | 4.74% | 4.05% | 4.44% | 3.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFRHX and BIL have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFRHX has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to BIL (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFRHX dropped -22.20% vs BIL's -0.78%.
BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.63 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFRHX and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer